Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;135(1):74e-84e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000845.

Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty after massive weight loss: an efficient procedure with a high functional benefit

Antoine de Runz  1 , Thomas Colson, Christophe Minetti, Muriel Brix, Julien Pujo, Heloïse Gisquet, Etienne Simon
Affiliations

Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty after massive weight loss: an efficient procedure with a high functional benefit

Antoine de Runz et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Brachioplasty frequently offers functional benefits but results in poor aesthetic scars and a relatively high complication rate. The authors describe the complications and risk factors inherent in liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty and assess patient satisfaction with the functional and aesthetic benefits.

Methods: A 5-year retrospective study was performed that included all patients who underwent liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty. Complications were reviewed and analyzed by aesthetic and nonaesthetic categories, and patient satisfaction was rated.

Results: Sixty-six patients were included (mean age, 44.4 years). The average body mass index was 30.2 kg/m; mean weight reduction was 50.72 kg. Thirty-seven patients (56.1 percent) developed at least one complication, including six (9.1 percent) with a nonaesthetic complication versus 31 (47.0 percent) with an aesthetic complication. Complications were significantly associated with a longer operative time (p = 0.015), 233 minutes in the complication group versus 164 minutes in the no-complication group. Fifty-three patients answered the questionnaire. Forty-six (86.8 percent) stated that they would undergo this intervention again. Overall satisfaction was reported as excellent for 12 patients (22.6 percent) and pleasing for 24 (45.3 percent). All patients rated the functional outcome superior or equal to the aesthetic outcome. Quality of life was estimated to be better after than before the intervention for 41 patients (77.4 percent).

Conclusions: Liposuction-assisted medial brachioplasty is a safe and efficient technique. It offers a functional benefit with a low nonaesthetic complication rate. Despite the inherent scars, the majority of patients would undergo this intervention again because of an important satisfaction rate and improvement in quality of life.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, III.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ. Complications in body contouring procedures: An analysis of 1,797 patients from the 2006–2010 ACS-NSQIP databases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1411–1420
    1. Thorek M. Esthetic surgery of pendulous breast, abdomen and arms in the female. Ill Med J. 1930;58:48–57
    1. Pascal JF, Le Louarn C. Brachioplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29:423–429
    1. Nguyen AT, Rohrich RJ. Liposuction-assisted posterior brachioplasty: Technical refinements in upper arm contouring. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1365–1369
    1. Zomerlei TA, Neaman KC, Armstrong SD, et al. Brachioplasty outcomes: A review of a multipractice cohort. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:883–889