Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Dec 23:15:507.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-507.

Impact of early enteral versus parenteral nutrition on mortality in patients requiring mechanical ventilation and catecholamines: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (NUTRIREA-2)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of early enteral versus parenteral nutrition on mortality in patients requiring mechanical ventilation and catecholamines: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (NUTRIREA-2)

Laurent Brisard et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Nutritional support is crucial to the management of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and the most commonly prescribed treatment in intensive care units (ICUs). International guidelines consistently indicate that enteral nutrition (EN) should be preferred over parenteral nutrition (PN) whenever possible and started as early as possible. However, no adequately designed study has evaluated whether a specific nutritional modality is associated with decreased mortality. The primary goal of this trial is to assess the hypothesis that early first-line EN, as compared to early first-line PN, decreases day 28 all-cause mortality in patients receiving IMV and vasoactive drugs for shock.

Methods/design: The NUTRIREA-2 study is a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial comparing early PN versus early EN in critically ill patients requiring IMV for an expected duration of at least 48 hours, combined with vasoactive drugs, for shock. Patients will be allocated at random to first-line PN for at least 72 hours or to first-line EN. In both groups, nutritional support will be started within 24 hours after IMV initiation. Calorie targets will be 20 to 25 kcal/kg/day during the first week, then 25 to 30 kcal/kg/day thereafter. Patients receiving PN may be switched to EN after at least 72 hours in the event of shock resolution (no vasoactive drugs for 24 consecutive hours and arterial lactic acid level below 2 mmol/L). On day 7, all patients receiving PN and having no contraindications to EN will be switched to EN. In both groups, supplemental PN may be added to EN after day 7 in patients with persistent intolerance to EN and inadequate calorie intake. We plan to recruit 2,854 patients at 44 participating ICUs.

Discussion: The NUTRIREA-2 study is the first large randomized controlled trial designed to assess the hypothesis that early EN improves survival compared to early PN in ICU patients. Enrollment started on 22 March 2013 and is expected to end in November 2015.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01802099 (registered 27 February 2013).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study protocol. D, Day; EN, Enteral nutrition; ICU, Intensive care unit; PN, Parenteral nutrition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Protocol for managing upper gastrointestinal intolerance. GI, Gastrointestinal; NGT, Nasogastric tube. Response J Reignier: this is correct.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protocol for diarrhea management.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flow diagram of NUTRIREA-2 trial according to CONSORT.

References

    1. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:355–373. doi: 10.1177/0148607103027005355. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NEP, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G, Nitenberg G, van den Berghe G, Wernerman J, DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine) Ebner C, Hartl W, Heymann C, Spies C. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:210–223. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L, Cresci G, the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors, the American College of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:277–316. doi: 10.1177/0148607109335234. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thuong M, Leteurtre S. [Experts recommendations of the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française: enteral nutrition in critical care] [Article in French] Reanimation. 2003;12:350–354. doi: 10.1016/S1624-0693(03)00079-3. - DOI
    1. Beier-Holgersen R, Boesby S. Influence of postoperative enteral nutrition on postsurgical infections. Gut. 1996;39:833–835. doi: 10.1136/gut.39.6.833. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data