Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 23:7:952.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-952.

The validation of Fibit Zip™ physical activity monitor as a measure of free-living physical activity

Mark A Tully  1 , Cairmeal McBride, Leonnie Heron, Ruth F Hunter
Affiliations

The validation of Fibit Zip™ physical activity monitor as a measure of free-living physical activity

Mark A Tully et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: The new generation of activity monitors allow users to upload their data to the internet and review progress. The aim of this study is to validate the Fitbit Zip as a measure of free-living physical activity.

Findings: Participants wore a Fitbit Zip, ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer and a Yamax CW700 pedometer for seven days. Participants were asked their opinion on the utility of the Fitbit Zip. Validity was assessed by comparing the output using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Bland-Altman plots. 59.5% (25/47) of the cohort were female. There was a high correlation in steps/day between the Fitbit Zip and the two reference devices (r = 0.91, p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference between the Fitbit and Yamax steps/day was observed (Median (IQR) 7477 (3597) vs 6774 (3851); p = 0.11). The Fitbit measured significantly more steps/day than the Actigraph (7477 (3597) vs 6774 (3851); p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic differences between the devices.

Conclusions: Given the high level of correlation and no apparent systematic biases in the Bland Altman plots, the use of Fitbit Zip as a measure of physical activity. However the Fitbit Zip recorded a significantly higher number of steps per day than the Actigraph.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bland-Altman plot for Fitbit vs Actigraph steps/day (n=42).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bland-Altman plot for Fitbit vs Yamax steps/day (n=42).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka S, Montes F, Brownson RC, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):272–281. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60816-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kolt GS, Rosenkranz RR, Savage TN, Maeder AJ, Vandelanotte C, Duncan MJ, Caperchione CM, Tague R, Hooker C, Mummery WK. WALK 2.0 - using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:436. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-436. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies CA, Spence JC, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK. Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-52. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sasaki JE, Hickey A, Mavilia M, Tedesco J, John D, Kozey Keadle S, Freedson PS. J Phys Act Health. 2014. Validation of the Fitbit Wireless Activity Tracker® for Prediction of Energy Expenditure. - PubMed
    1. Dannecker KL, Sazonova NA, Melanson EL, Sazonov ES, Browning RC. A comparison of energy expenditure estimation of several physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(11):2105–2112. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318299d2eb. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types