Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;24(2):142-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003194. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits

Affiliations

Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits

Lisa Calder et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: This study describes the proportion of emergency department (ED) returns within 7 days due to adverse events, defined as adverse outcomes related to healthcare received.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: We used an electronically triggered adverse event surveillance system at a tertiary care ED from May to June 2010 to examine ED returns within 7 days of index visit.

Participants: One of three trained nurses determined whether the visit was related to index emergency care. For such records, one of three trained emergency physicians conducted adverse event determinations.

Main outcome measure: We determined adverse event type and severity and analysed the data with descriptive statistics, χ(2) tests and logistic regression.

Results: Of 13,495 index ED visits, 923 (6.8%) were followed by ED returns within 7 days. The median age of all patients was 47 years and 52.8% were women. After nursing review, 211 cases required physician review. Of these, 53 visits were adverse events (positive predictive value (PPV)=5.7%, 95% CI 4.4% to 7.4%) and 30 (56.6%) were preventable. Common adverse event types involved management, diagnostic or medication issues. We observed one potentially preventable death and 58.5% of adverse events resulting in transient disability. The PPV of a modified trigger with a cut-off of return within 72 h, resulting in admission was 11.9% (95% CI 6.8% to 18.9%).

Conclusions: Our electronic trigger efficiently identified adverse events among 12% of patients with ED returns within 72 h, requiring hospital admission. Given the high degree of preventability of the identified adverse events, this trigger also holds promise as a performance measurement tool.

Keywords: Emergency department; Patient safety; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow for 13 495 emergency department (ED) visits, 9 May 9–13 June 2010.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of adverse events cases.

References

    1. Forster AJ, Rose NGW, van Walraven C, et al.. Adverse events following an emergency department visit. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:17–22. 10.1136/qshc.2005.017384 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ross MA, Hemphill RR, Abramson J, et al. The recidivism characteristics of an emergency department observation unit. Ann Emerg Med 2010;56:34–41. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pierce JM, Kellerman AL, Oster C. “Bounces”: an analysis of short-term return visits to a public hospital emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:752–7. 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81698-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu CL, Wang FT, Chiang YC, et al. Unplanned emergency department revisits within 72 hours to a secondary teaching referral hospital in Taiwan. J Emerg Med 2010;38:512–17. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman SM, Provan D, Moore S, et al. Errors, near misses and adverse events in the emergency department: what can patients tell us? CJEM 2008;10:421–7. - PubMed

Publication types