Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;11(6):624-30.

Noise levels of dental equipment used in dental college of Damascus University

Affiliations

Noise levels of dental equipment used in dental college of Damascus University

Mhd Loutify Qsaibati et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Background: In dental practical classes, the acoustic environment is characterized by high noise levels in relation to other teaching areas. The aims of this study were to measure noise levels produced during the different dental learning clinics, by equipments used in dental learning areas under different working conditions and by used and brand new handpieces under different working conditions.

Materials and methods: The noise levels were measured by using a noise level meter with a microphone, which was placed at a distance of 15 cm from a main noise source in pre-clinical and clinical areas. In laboratories, the microphone was placed at a distance of 15 cm and another reading was taken 2 m away. Noise levels of dental learning clinics were measured by placing noise level meter at clinic center. The data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using t-tests. Significance level was set at 5%.

Results: In dental clinics, the highest noise was produced by micro motor handpiece while cutting on acrylic (92.2 dB) and lowest noise (51.7 dB) was created by ultrasonic scaler without suction pump. The highest noise in laboratories was caused by sandblaster (96 dB at a distance of 15 cm) and lowest noise by stone trimmer when only turned on (61.8 dB at a distance of 2 m). There was significant differences in noise levels of the equipment's used in dental laboratories and dental learning clinics (P = 0.007). The highest noise level recorded in clinics was at pedodontic clinic (67.37 dB).

Conclusions: Noise levels detected in this study were considered to be close to the limit of risk of hearing loss 85 dB.

Keywords: Dental public health; occupational dentistry; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average noise levels of used and brand new dental turbine compared
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean noise levels of high-speed turbine and contra angle handpieces

References

    1. Setcos JC, Mahyuddin A. Noise levels encountered in dental clinical and laboratory practice. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:150–7. - PubMed
    1. Miranda FJ. Protect your hearing. Dental office sounds may be hazardous to your health. J Okla Dent Assoc. 1985;75:38–9. - PubMed
    1. Kilpatrick HC. Decibel ratings of dental office sounds. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:175–8. - PubMed
    1. Passchier-Vermeer W, Passchier WF. Noise exposure and public health. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl 1):123–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kulkarni GK, Panjwani RC, D’souza JA, Mangave BB. Cross sectional survey on non-auditory effects of noise in an engineering industry. Indian J Ind Med. 1993;39:106–10.

LinkOut - more resources