Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2015 Apr;51(4):193-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

"Correct use of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease": a consensus document

[Article in English, Spanish]
Collaborators, Affiliations
Practice Guideline

"Correct use of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease": a consensus document

[Article in English, Spanish]
Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete et al. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Indications for inhaled corticosteroids (IC) in combination with long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) are well defined in clinical practice guidelines. However, there are some doubts about their efficacy and safety. The aim of this document is to establish an expert consensus to clarify these issues.

Method: A coordinator group was formed, which systematically reviewed the scientific evidence with the aim of identifying areas of uncertainty about the efficacy of ICs, the adverse effects associated with their use and criteria for withdrawal. Their proposals were submitted to a panel of experts and the Delphi technique was used to test the level of consensus.

Results: Twenty-five experts participated in the panel, and consensus was reached on the use of IC in the mixed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-asthma phenotype and in frequent exacerbators, and on not using IC in association with LABD for improving lung function in COPD. There was no general consensus on restricting the use of IC to prevent adverse effects. The panel did agree that IC withdrawal is feasible but should be undertaken gradually, and patients who have discontinued must be evaluated in the short term.

Conclusions: Consensus was reached regarding the indication of IC in mixed COPD-asthma and frequent exacerbator phenotypes. The potential for adverse effects must be taken into consideration, but there is no consensus on whether limiting use is justified. The withdrawal of ICs was uniformly agreed to be feasible.

Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Corticoides inhalados; Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica; Guidelines; Inhaled corticosteroids; Normativas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources