Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;71(5):1110-22.
doi: 10.1111/jan.12609. Epub 2014 Dec 28.

A cross-sectional survey of factors related to inpatient assault of staff in a forensic psychiatric hospital

Affiliations

A cross-sectional survey of factors related to inpatient assault of staff in a forensic psychiatric hospital

Erin L Kelly et al. J Adv Nurs. 2015 May.

Abstract

Aim: To understand staff factors associated with patient aggression towards the staff of an inpatient forensic psychiatric hospital.

Background: Violence by patients is a serious concern in psychiatric hospitals and staff are the most frequent targets of physical and verbal assault. Assault and its consequences can severely disrupt the hospital environment and impair the functioning of staff members and patients. This study examined the interplay of staff dispositional and interpersonal factors associated with patient violence.

Design: This cross-sectional study surveyed the staff of a large public forensic hospital.

Methods: A sample of 348 psychiatric staff participated in an online survey about their workplace experiences, psychosocial characteristics and well-being. Data were collected from November - December 2011.

Findings: Nearly all staff reported verbal conflict with patients (99%) and 70% reported being assaulted during the previous 12 months. Verbal conflict with other staff (92%) was also high. Multiple regression analyses indicated that in addition to static risk factors (i.e. staff position, years of experience and gender), the risk of assault was associated with the frequency of conflicts with staff and patients, which in turn was moderated by personal stress reactivity.

Conclusion: Physical violence by patients was a pervasive threat for a high proportion of staff. Frequent conflict interactions with volatile patients contributed the most risk, but reactivity to conflict was a dynamic risk factor. The strain associated with assault risk and stress reactivity could be prospectively mitigated by resilience enhancement programming for staff.

Keywords: assault; forensic mental health; psychiatric nursing; workplace violence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources