Sensitivity of high-risk HPV Hybrid Capture II (hrHPV HC2) test using SurePath(TM) specimens in the prediction of cervical high-grade squamous lesions
- PMID: 25546355
- DOI: 10.1002/dc.23243
Sensitivity of high-risk HPV Hybrid Capture II (hrHPV HC2) test using SurePath(TM) specimens in the prediction of cervical high-grade squamous lesions
Abstract
Introduction: High-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing is now considered standard of care in the detection and management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL/CIN 2-3) and their precursors. Recently, there has been concern in the scientific literature and lay media about the lack of data regarding the false-negative rate (FNR) of HPV testing on SurePath(TM) cytology specimens. This is a critical issue, since guidelines on the management of Pap test abnormalities rely heavily on HPV status. We undertook this study to determine whether HPV testing on SurePath(TM) specimens is less sensitive compared to reports in the literature for ThinPrep®.
Methods: We identified women with new diagnoses of CIN 2, CIN 3, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on biopsy or excision in 2009-2013. For each patient, we recorded all SurePath(TM) cytology and hrHPV HC2 (high-risk HPV Hybrid Capture 2) test results from within 5 years prior to histologic diagnosis. Using the histologic diagnosis as the gold standard, we calculated the sensitivities of cytology and hrHPV HC2 tests for the detection of CIN 2, 3, and SCC. Our findings are based only on women who underwent biopsy or excision after having an abnormal cytology and/or positive HPV result.
Results: In our cohort, the sensitivity of testing in the 5 years prior to histologic diagnosis of CIN 2, 3, and SCC (combined as a single group) is 98.4% for SurePath(TM) cytology, 95.3% for hrHPV HC2, and 100% if both tests are used together. No conclusion can be drawn regarding testing for SCC alone, because there was only one case of SCC.
Conclusion: Our results show that the false-negative rate of hrHPV HC2 testing on SurePath(TM) specimens for the detection of CIN 2 and CIN 3 is low and comparable to that of ThinPrep® specimens.
Keywords: Hybrid Capture II; SurePath; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; false-negative rate; high-risk HPV; sensitivity.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
HPV detection rates and histopathologic follow-up of patients with HSIL cytology in a large academic women's hospital laboratory.J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):550-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 May 6. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020. PMID: 32475726
-
HPV-ISH-Negative Invasive Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Histologic and Pap Test Results.Acta Cytol. 2019;63(5):417-423. doi: 10.1159/000500595. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Acta Cytol. 2019. PMID: 31195388
-
Introduction of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening in Luxembourg.Diagn Cytopathol. 2017 May;45(5):384-390. doi: 10.1002/dc.23678. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017. PMID: 28247516
-
Negative computer-imaged ThinPrep Pap test and positive hybrid capture2 HPV co-testing results: A quality assurance review.Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Sep;43(9):763-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.23303. Epub 2015 Jul 15. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015. PMID: 26173579 Review.
-
Aptima HPV messenger RNA testing and histopathologic follow-up in women with HSIL cytology: A study emphasizing additional review of HPV-negative cases.Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Aug;129(8):622-631. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22421. Epub 2021 Mar 25. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021. PMID: 33764649 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparison of different human papillomavirus tests in PreservCyt versus SurePath in a referral population-PREDICTORS 4.J Clin Virol. 2016 Sep;82:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jul 27. J Clin Virol. 2016. PMID: 27498250 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials