Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;93(29):e275.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000275.

Non-union rate with stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Affiliations

Non-union rate with stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion

Robert Watkins 4th et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Retrospective radiographic analysis.To determine the fusion rate of stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Biomechanical studies have indicated that LLIF may be more stable than anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Early clinical reports of stand-alone LLIF have shown success in obtaining fusion and indirectly decompressing nerve roots. A consecutive case series of stand-alone LLIF was analyzed with chart and radiographic review. Non-union was determined by symptomatology consistent with non-union and absence of bridging bone on the CT scan. Thirty-nine levels of stand alone LLIF were performed in 23 patients. Eleven patients received 1-level surgery, 7 patients received 2-level surgery, 3 patients received 3-level surgery, and 1 patient received 4-level surgery. Excluding 1 infected case, we analyzed 37 levels of stand alone LLIF in 22 patients. Non-union incidence was 7 levels in 6 patients. Non-union rate was 7/37 (19%) per level and 6/22 (27%) per patient. While our study population was relatively low, a non-union rate of 19% to 27% is concerning for modern spine surgery. Currently in our practice, we occasionally still perform stand-alone LLIF utilizing 22 mm wide grafts in low-demand levels in non-smoking and non-osteoporotic patients. However, in a majority of patients, we provide supplemental fixation: bilateral pedicle screws in most patients and unilateral pedicle screws or spinous process plates in some patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author A is a paid consultant for RTI, Medtronic, Aesculap, Brainlab, and Amedica; he has development/royalty agreements with RTI and Amedica; is a paid director of the Marina Spine Center. Author C is a paid consultant for RTI, Aesculap, and Amedica; he has development/royalty agreements with RTI, Medtronic, and Amedica; is a paid director of the Marina Spine Center. Author B has no possible conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Pre-operative CT scan showing L2 to L3 degeneration and stenosis adjacent to previous L3 to S1 fusion.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
After 3 month pain-free interval, neurogenic claudication symptoms returned. Six-month postoperative CT scan shows subsidence of graft and ossification of annular bulge causing stenosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hsieh P, Koski T, O'Shaughnessy B, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumber interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7:379–386. - PubMed
    1. Watkins RG, IV, Hanna R, Chang D, Watkins RG., III Sagital alignment after lumbar interbody fusions: comparing anterior, lateral and transforaminal approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; 27:253–256. - PubMed
    1. Simmonds MC, Brown JV, Heirs MK, et al. Safety and effectiveness of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of individual-participant data. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158:877–889. - PubMed
    1. Kepler CK, Sharma AK, Huang RC, et al. Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16:329–333. - PubMed
    1. Elowitz EH, Yanni DS, Chwajol M, et al. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis. Minim Invas Neurosurg 2011; 54:201–206. - PubMed

Substances