Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;12(4):782-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.031. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

Electrical dyssynchrony induced by biventricular pacing: implications for patient selection and therapy improvement

Affiliations

Electrical dyssynchrony induced by biventricular pacing: implications for patient selection and therapy improvement

Sylvain Ploux et al. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Biventricular pacing (BVP) may not achieve complete electrical resynchronization.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the resynchronizing effect of BVP varies among patients depending on the underlying electrical substrate.

Methods: High-resolution electrocardiographic mapping with invasive measurement of the maximal rate of systolic left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (LVdP/dtmax) was performed during baseline activation and during BVP in 61 patients with heart failure with various conduction delays: 13 with narrow QRS duration (<120 ms), 22 with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance, and 26 with left bundle branch block. Electrical dyssynchrony, both during baseline activation and BVP, was quantified by total and LV activation times (TAT and LVTAT) and by ventricular electrical uncoupling (VEU = mean LVTAT - mean right ventricular activation time). Response to BVP was defined as a ≥10% increase in LVdP/dtmax.

Results: The electrical activation pattern during BVP was similar for all patient groups and, hence, not dependent on baseline conduction disturbance. During BVP, TAT, LVTAT, and VEU were similar for all groups and were either not correlated or weakly correlated with the change in LVdP/dtmax. In contrast, changes in electrical dyssynchrony correlated significantly with the change in LVdP/dtmax: r=0.71, 0.69, and 0.69 for ∆TAT, ∆LVTAT, and ∆VEU, respectively (all P < .001). Responders showed higher baseline dyssynchrony levels and BVP-induced dyssynchrony reduction than did nonresponders (all P < .001); in nonresponders, BVP worsened activation times than did baseline activation.

Conclusion: BVP does not eliminate electrical dyssynchrony, but rather brings it to a common level independent of the patient's underlying electrical substrate. Therefore, BVP is of benefit to patients with dyssynchrony but not to patients with insufficient electrical dyssynchrony in whom it induces an iatrogenic electropathy.

Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Electrocardiographic mapping; Heart failure; Hemodynamic; Left bundle branch block; Nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance; Pacing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms