Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Apr;48(4):372-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

Use of online safety decision aid by abused women: effect on decisional conflict in a randomized controlled trial

Karen B Eden  1 , Nancy A Perrin  2 , Ginger C Hanson  2 , Jill T Messing  3 , Tina L Bloom  4 , Jacquelyn C Campbell  5 , Andrea C Gielen  6 , Amber S Clough  5 , Jamie S Barnes-Hoyt  5 , Nancy E Glass  7
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Use of online safety decision aid by abused women: effect on decisional conflict in a randomized controlled trial

Karen B Eden et al. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: An Internet safety decision aid was developed to help abused women understand their risk for repeat and near-lethal intimate partner violence, clarify priorities related to safety, and develop an action plan customized to these priorities.

Purpose: To test the effectiveness of a safety decision aid compared with usual safety planning (control) delivered through a secure website, using a multistate RCT design. The paper evaluates the effectiveness of the safety decision aid in reducing decisional conflict after a single use by abused women.

Design: RCT referred to as Internet Resource for Intervention and Safety (IRIS).

Setting/participants: Abused women who spoke English (n=708) were enrolled in a four-state RCT.

Intervention: The intervention was an interactive safety decision aid with personalized safety plan; the control condition was usual safety planning resources. Both were delivered to participants through the secure study website.

Main outcome measures: This paper compares women's decisional conflict about safety: total decisional conflict and the four subscales of this measure (feeling: uninformed, uncertain, unsupported, and unclear about safety priorities) between intervention/control conditions. Data were collected from March 2011 to May 2013 and analyzed from January to March 2014.

Results: Immediately following the first use of the interactive safety decision aid, intervention women had significantly lower total decisional conflict than control women, controlling for baseline value of decisional conflict (p=0.002, effect size=0.12). After controlling for baseline values, the safety decision aid group had significantly greater reduction in feeling uncertain (p=0.006, effect size=0.07) and in feeling unsupported (p=0.008, effect size=0.07) about safety than the usual safety planning group.

Conclusions: Abused women randomized to the safety decision aid reported less decisional conflict about their safety in the abusive intimate relationship after one use compared to women randomized to the usual safety planning condition.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01312103.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen shot of priority setting activity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Feedback on safety priority weights.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Feedback from danger assessment
Figure 4
Figure 4
Participant flow
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, Smith SG, Walters ML, Merrick MT, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
    1. Black MC. Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences: implications for clinicians. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011 Sep 1;5(5):428–39.
    1. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1331–6. - PubMed
    1. Cavanaugh C, Messing J, Del-Colle M, O’ Sullivan C, Campbell J. Prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among adult female victims of intimate partner violence. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2011;41(4):372–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA, Kaufman JS, Lo B, Zonderman AB. Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Sep;75(6):959–75. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data