Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116351.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116351. eCollection 2014.

Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis

Affiliations

Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis

Michael S Adamowicz et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Samples for forensic DNA analysis are often collected from a wide variety of objects using cotton or nylon tipped swabs. Testing has shown that significant quantities of DNA are retained on the swab, however, and subsequently lost. When processing evidentiary samples, the recovery of the maximum amount of available DNA is critical, potentially dictating whether a usable profile can be derived from a piece of evidence or not. The QIAamp DNA Investigator extraction kit was used with its recommended protocol for swabs (one hour incubation at 56°C) as a baseline. Results indicate that over 50% of the recoverable DNA may be retained on the cotton swab tip, or otherwise lost, for both blood and buccal cell samples when using this protocol. The protocol's incubation time and temperature were altered, as was incubating while shaking or stationary to test for increases in recovery efficiency. An additional step was then tested that included periodic re-suspension of the swab tip in the extraction buffer during incubation. Aliquots of liquid blood or a buccal cell suspension were deposited and dried on cotton swabs and compared with swab-less controls. The concentration of DNA in each extract was quantified and STR analysis was performed to assess the quality of the extracted DNA. Stationary incubations and those performed at 65°C did not result in significant gains in DNA yield. Samples incubated for 24 hours yielded less DNA. Increased yields were observed with three and 18 hour incubation periods. Increases in DNA yields were also observed using a swab re-suspension method for both cell types. The swab re-suspension method yielded an average two-fold increase in recovered DNA yield with buccal cells and an average three-fold increase with blood cells. These findings demonstrate that more of the DNA collected on swabs can be recovered with specific protocol alterations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of average recovered DNA quantities from buccal cell suspension (20 µL) or blood (10 µL) dried onto cotton swabs versus liquid controls using the recommended protocol of incubation for 1 hour at 56°C with shaking (900 rpm).
Results are also shown for samples dried onto cotton swabs and extracted after an incubation for 1 hour at 56°C with shaking (900 rpm) with swab re-suspension. N = 3.

References

    1. Lee HC, Gaensslen RE, Bigbee PD, Kearney JJ (1991) Guidelines for the collection and preservation of DNA evidence. J Forensic Ident 41:344–356.
    1. Lee HC, Ladd C, Scherczinger CA, Bourke MT (1998) Forensic applications of DNA typing Part 2: Collection and preservation of DNA evidence. Am J Forensic Med and Pathol 19:10–18. - PubMed
    1. Verdon TJ, Mitchell RJ, van Oorschot RAH (2014) Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates. J Forensic Sci 59:1080–1089. - PubMed
    1. Wickenheiser RA (2002) Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. J Forensic Sci 47:442–450. - PubMed
    1. de Bruin KG, Verheij SM, Veenhoven M, Sijen T (2012) Comparison of stubbing and the double swab method for collecting offender epithelial material from a victim’s skin. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:219–223. - PubMed

Publication types