Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 19;8(1):9.
doi: 10.1186/s13022-014-0009-3. eCollection 2014.

Outcome-volume relationships and transhiatal esophagectomy: minimizing "failure to rescue"

Renee L Arlow  1 , Dirk F Moore  2 , Chunxia Chen  2 , John Langenfeld  3 , David A August  1
Affiliations

Outcome-volume relationships and transhiatal esophagectomy: minimizing "failure to rescue"

Renee L Arlow et al. Ann Surg Innov Res. .

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to describe the system and technical factors that enabled our moderate size transhiatal esophagectomy program to achieve low mortality rates.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 200 consecutive patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital. Primary outcomes included operative times, estimated blood loss, frequency and nature of complications, and lengths of stay in the hospital and the intensive care unit.

Results: In general, surgical outcomes tended to improve over the course of this study. We identified decreased operative time, intra-operative blood loss, frequency of complications, and lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stay as the program matured. Through coordinated actions of the surgical and anesthesia teams, all intraoperative injuries were responded to in an effective, emergent fashion and all but one patient was saved. This resulted in an inhospital and 30-day mortality rate of only 0.5%.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that a dual attending approach, focus on avoiding "failure to rescue", increased volume, and a surgeon driven commitment to quality improvement may lead to low mortality rates after transhiatal esophagectomy.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Failure to rescue; Outcome-volume relationships; Postoperative complication; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline for the introduction of technical changes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of esophagectomies completed per year.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Silber JH, Williams SV, Krakauer H, Schwartz JS. Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue. Med Care. 1992;30:615–629. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199207000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler N, Collins S, Memon B, Memon MA. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2071–2083. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1511-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2007;246:363–372. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31814697f2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawoosa NU, Dar AM, Sharma ML, Ahangar AG, Lone GN, Bhat MA, Singh S. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution. World J Surg. 2011;35:1296–1302. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1020-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rohatgi A, Forshaw MJ, Sutcliffe RP, Strauss DC, Mason RC. Transhiatal oesophagectomy: techniques, tips and outcomes. Surgeon. 2008;6:335–340. doi: 10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80004-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources