Prognostic value and efficacy evaluation of novel drugs for cytogenetic aberrations in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 25550914
- PMCID: PMC4276172
Prognostic value and efficacy evaluation of novel drugs for cytogenetic aberrations in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Cytogenetic abnormalities have emerged as the major novel prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. This meta-analysis comprehensively investigates the association between the cytogenetic abnormalities and survival of MM patients. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for articles published until February, 2014. Thirty eligible studies involving 10276 patients were included to examine the association of three chromosomal abnormalities, t (4; 14), del (17p), and Amp (1q21), with survival in MM patients. The main outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Individuals with t (4; 14), del (17p), and Amp (1q21) had low OS and PFS. In a subgroup analysis for therapy regimen, lenalidomide- and bortezomib-based therapies increased the PFS of patients with Amp (1q21) (HR=1.50, 95% CI=0.95-2.36, p=0.084) and t (4; 14) (HR=1.38, 95% CI=0.90-2.11, p=0.143). The presence of del (17p) elicited no significant influence on the prognosis of patients under different therapy regimens. Our meta-analysis provides globally quantifiable confirmation of the adverse prognostic value of t (4; 14), del (17p), and Amp (1q21) in OS and PFS for MM patients. Lenalidomide- and bortezomib-based therapies were partly conducive to improve the prognosis of individuals with t (4; 14). Bortezomib-based therapy can partly improve the PFS of patients with Amp (1q21).
Keywords: Cytogenetic aberrations; bortezomib; lenalidomide; meta-analysis; multiple myeloma; prognosis.
Figures




References
-
- Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Blade J, Boccadoro M, Child JA, Avet-Loiseau H, Kyle RA, Lahuerta JJ, Ludwig H, Morgan G, Powles R, Shimizu K, Shustik C, Sonneveld P, Tosi P, Turesson I, Westin J. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:3412–3420. - PubMed
-
- Fonseca R, Blood E, Rue M, Harrington D, Oken MM, Kyle RA, Dewald GW, Van Ness B, Van Wier SA, Henderson KJ, Bailey RJ, Greipp PR. Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma. Blood. 2003;101:4569–4575. - PubMed
-
- Moreau P, Facon T, Leleu X, Morineau N, Huyghe P, Harousseau JL, Bataille R, Avet-Loiseau H Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. Recurrent 14q32 translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma, especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. Blood. 2002;100:1579–1583. - PubMed
-
- Shaughnessy J Jr, Tian E, Sawyer J, McCoy J, Tricot G, Jacobson J, Anaissie E, Zangari M, Fassas A, Muwalla F, Morris C, Barlogie B. Prognostic impact of cytogenetic and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization-defined chromosome 13 deletion in multiple myeloma: early results of total therapy II. Br J Haematol. 2003;120:44–52. - PubMed
-
- Dewald GW, Kyle RA, Hicks GA, Greipp PR. The clinical significance of cytogenetic studies in 100 patients with multiple myeloma, plasma cell leukemia, or amyloidosis. Blood. 1985;66:380–390. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources