Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jan 1:21:1-8.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.891183.

Etomidate-remifentanil is more suitable for monitored anesthesia care during gastroscopy in older patients than propofol-remifentanil

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Etomidate-remifentanil is more suitable for monitored anesthesia care during gastroscopy in older patients than propofol-remifentanil

Xiao-Chun Shen et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

Background: This prospective and randomized study was designed to compare safety, potential complications, and patient and examiner satisfaction of 2 anesthetic combinations - etomidate-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil - in elderly patients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy.

Material and methods: A group of 720 patients, aged 60-80 years, scheduled for diagnostic gastroscopy under sedation were prospectively randomized. After 0.4-0.6 μg kg⁻¹ of remifentanil was infused, etomidate or propofol was administered. Patients in the etomidate group received doses of etomidate at 0.1-0.15 mg kg⁻¹ followed by 4-6 mg. Patients in the propofol group received doses of propofol at 1-2 mg kg⁻¹ followed by 20-40 mg. Physiological indexes were evaluated for the 715 of 720 patients that completed the treatment. The onset time, duration time, and discharge time were recorded. Physicians, anesthetists, and patients were surveyed to assess their satisfaction.

Results: Systolic pressure and diastolic pressure decreased significantly after the procedure in the propofol group (P<0.001). The average heart rate was significantly lower in the propofol group (P<0.05). No periods of desaturation (SpO₂ <95%) were observed in either group. The onset time was earlier in the etomidate group (P=0.00). All adverse events, with the exception of myoclonus, were greater in the propofol group, and physician and patient satisfaction in both groups was similar.

Conclusions: Etomidate-remifentanil administration for sedation and analgesia during gastroscopy resulted in more stable hemodynamic responses and less adverse events in older patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient assignment for endoscopy (GI, gastrointestinal).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Systolic pressure (A), diastolic pressure (B), heart rate (C), and changes in peripheral oxygen saturation (D) in patients with successful anesthesia using propofol or etomidate. * P<0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Soweid AM, Yaghi SR, Jamali FR, et al. Posterior lingual lidocaine: A novel method to improve tolerance in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:5191–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amornyotin S. Sedation-related complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;5:527–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lucendo AJ, Arias Á, González-Castillo S, et al. Same-day bidirectional endoscopy with nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: safety and cost-effectiveness compared with separated exams. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26:301–8. - PubMed
    1. Falk J, Zed PJ. Etomidate for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1272–77. - PubMed
    1. Hsu WH, Wang SSW, Shih HY, et al. Low effect-site concentration of propofol target-controlled infusion reduces the risk of hypotension during endoscopy in a Taiwanese population. J Dig Dos. 2013;14:147–52. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms