Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;24(2):93-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography

Affiliations
Review

Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography

T M Svahn et al. Breast. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

We examined how radiation dose levels in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) differ from those used in 2-view full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Acquisition parameter settings and information on the average absorbed dose to the glandular tissues within the breasts were reviewed based on clinical studies that evaluated DBT and FFDM. Dose ratios (DDBT/DFFDM) were derived from imaging protocols, which included tomosynthesis in 1- or 2-views alone, and as an adjunct technique to FFDM. Stand-alone DBT was associated with a much lower to a slightly higher radiation dose compared to that of comparable FFDM units, as summarized in dose ratio ranges of 0.34-1.0 for 1-view DBT, and 0.68-1.17 for 2-view DBT. One of the lowest reported dose estimates was obtained using a photon-counting DBT unit (avg. 0.70 mGy/scan; range: 0.28-1.26 mGy). Breast doses for DBT combined with FFDM are summarized in dose ratio ranges of 1.03-1.5 for 1-view DBT plus FFDM, and 2.0-2.23 for 2-view DBT plus FFDM. In the latter of these settings, the dose was reduced by ∼45% when 2D-views, reconstructed from the DBT images ("synthetic 2D images"), were used as a substitute for FFDM. Stand-alone DBT operated at lower to slightly higher radiation doses in comparison to FFDM. For DBT combined with FFDM, radiation doses were elevated, at maximum by a factor ∼2 1/4 of that of FFDM alone. In this setting, a replacement of FFDM with synthetic 2D-views reduced the breast dose approximately by half, which has substantial implications for population screening programs.

Keywords: Digital breast tomosynthesis; Full-field digital mammography; Radiation doses to the breast.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):583–9. - PubMed
    1. Skaane P, Gullien R, Bjorndal H, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol. 2012;53(5):524–9. - PubMed
    1. Thomassin-Naggara I, Perrot N, Dechoux S, Chopier J, De Bazelaire J. Added value of one-view breast tomosynthesis combined with digital mammography according to reader experience. ECR 2014 on demand. 2014 http://ipp.myesr.org/esr/ecr2014/ - PubMed
    1. Martínez Miravete P, Paramo M, Salazar R, Etxano J, Apesteguia L, Pina Insausti LJ. Digital mammography vs digital breast tomosynthesis in an enriched sample. 2014
    1. Svahn T, Andersson I, Chakraborty D, Svensson S, Ikeda D, Fornvik D, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2010;139(1–3):113–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types