Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;24(4):043124.
doi: 10.1063/1.4901334.

Estimating the epidemic threshold on networks by deterministic connections

Affiliations

Estimating the epidemic threshold on networks by deterministic connections

Kezan Li et al. Chaos. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

For many epidemic networks some connections between nodes are treated as deterministic, while the remainder are random and have different connection probabilities. By applying spectral analysis to several constructed models, we find that one can estimate the epidemic thresholds of these networks by investigating information from only the deterministic connections. Nonetheless, in these models, generic nonuniform stochastic connections and heterogeneous community structure are also considered. The estimation of epidemic thresholds is achieved via inequalities with upper and lower bounds, which are found to be in very good agreement with numerical simulations. Since these deterministic connections are easier to detect than those stochastic connections, this work provides a feasible and effective method to estimate the epidemic thresholds in real epidemic networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Example of an epidemic network with two unattached sub-networks: deterministic network G and stochastic network Gc.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Comparisons between the epidemic threshold βc and upper-lower bound estimation under different network sizes n and uniform stochastic probability α = 0.01 in (a), (c), and α = 0.001 in (b), (d).
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Comparisons between the epidemic threshold βc and upper-lower bound estimation under different network sizes n and parameter η = 0.5 in (a), (c), and η = 0.2 in (b), (d).
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Comparisons between the epidemic threshold βc and upper-lower bound estimation under different network sizes n and parameters μ = 0.1, σ2 = 0.001 in (a), (c), and μ = 0.2, σ2 = 0.001 in (b), (d).
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Comparisons between the epidemic threshold βc and upper-lower bound estimation under different community sizes m and n.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Comparisons between the epidemic threshold βc, upper bound, and optimal upper bound estimation under different community sizes m and n.

Similar articles

References

    1. Pastor-Satorras R. and Vespignani A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3200 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3200 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boguñá M. and Pastor-Satorras R., Phys. Rev. E 66, 047104 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevE.66.047104 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Y., Chakrabarti D., Wang C., and Faloutsos C., in 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distribute Systems ( IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2003), p. 25.
    1. Goltsev A. V., Dorogovtsev S. N., Oliveira J. G., and Mendes J. F. F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 128702 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.128702 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ganesh A., Massoulié L., and Towsley D., in IEEE INFOCOM (2005), Vol. 2, p. 1455.