Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;32(2):224-31.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu085. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

Role of patient treatment beliefs and provider characteristics in establishing patient-provider relationships

Patricia A Lee King  1 , Julie A Cederbaum  2 , Seth Kurzban  2 , Timothy Norton  2 , Steven C Palmer  3 , James C Coyne  3
Affiliations

Role of patient treatment beliefs and provider characteristics in establishing patient-provider relationships

Patricia A Lee King et al. Fam Pract. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Positive patient-provider relationships have been associated with improved depression treatment outcomes. Little is known about how patient treatment beliefs influence patient-provider relationships, specifically treatment alliance and shared decision making in primary care (PC).

Objective: We evaluated the relationship between patient treatment beliefs and patient-provider relationships by gender, race and current depression.

Methods: We used a deductive parallel convergent mixed method design with cross-sectional data. Participants were 227 Black and White patients presenting with depression symptoms in PC settings. Individuals were randomized into either a quantitative survey (n = 198) or qualitative interview (n = 29) group. We used multiple ordinary least squares regression to evaluate the association between patient beliefs, as measured by the Treatment Beliefs Scale and the Medication Beliefs Scale, and treatment alliance or shared decision making. We concurrently conducted thematic analyses of qualitative semistructured interview data to explicate the nature of patient-provider relationships.

Results: We found that patients who believed their provider would respectfully facilitate depression treatment reported greater bond, openness and shared decision making with their provider. We also identified qualitative themes of physicians listening to, caring about and respecting patients. Empathy and emotive expression increased patient trust in PC providers as facilitators of depression treatment.

Conclusions: This work systematically demonstrated what many providers anecdotally believe: PC environments in which individuals feel safe sharing psychological distress are essential to early identification and treatment of depression. Interprofessional skills-based training in attentiveness and active listening may influence the effectiveness of depression intervention.

Keywords: Depression/mood disorders; doctor–patient relationship; health disparities; primary care; quality of care..

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sampling flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theory Res Pract 1979; 16: 252–60.
    1. Ursano AM, Sonnenberg SM, Ursano RJ. Physician–patient relationship. In: Tasman A, Kay J, Lieberman JA, First MB, Maj M. (eds). Psychiatry. 3rd edn New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2008, pp. 20–32.
    1. Greenberg RP, Constantino MJ, Bruce N. Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome? Clin Psychol Rev 2006; 26: 657–78. - PubMed
    1. Krupnick JL, Sotsky SM, Simmens S, et al. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996; 64: 532–9. - PubMed
    1. Schattner A, Rudin D, Jellin N. Good physicians from the perspective of their patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2004; 4: 26. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types