Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 4:21:36-43.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.891365.

Repeatability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in young adults

Affiliations

Repeatability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in young adults

Krzysztof M Kochanek et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and variability of TEOAE characteristics in hearing screening tests performed under practical conditions on normal subjects.

Material/methods: A group of 11 young, normal-hearing subjects aged 19-24 years was tested. They were examined otologically and audiologically prior to the tests and no ear pathologies were found. Responses were acquired with a commercially available instrument (Integrity, Vivosonic Inc.) using a standardized OAE protocol. The TEOAE tests were repeated 3 times in each subject at random intervals within 24 h. The analyzed parameters of interest were: (i) whole wave reproducibility (WWR) and; (ii) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Results: WWR and SNR did not differ significantly among the 3 measurement sessions. In most cases the differences in WWR among measurements were around 1-2% and for SNRs they were 1-4 dB SNRs and were highest in the 1-2 kHz range. TEOAE-based tests can be useful tools for hearing screening.

Conclusions: The tests can give reliable results provided that adequate procedures are used and low-noise conditions are ensured. The tests are best complemented with other examinations to widen the range of ear pathologies able to be detected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average values of TEOAE signal (open symbols) and background noise level (filled symbols) obtained for 4 frequency bands from 3 sequential TEOAE measurements (test 1, 2, 3). Whiskers indicate standard deviations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual values of whole wave reproducibility (WWR) over 3 consecutive TEOAE measurements. Data for each subject are separated with vertical lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Histograms of absolute values of differences between WWRs determined from 3 consecutive TEOAE measurements. D1, D2, and D3 are the differences between measurements #1 and #2, #2 and #3, and #3 and #1, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Individual SNR values at 4 frequencies obtained from 3 consecutive TEOAE measurements. Dashed line denotes the acceptability criterion of SNR=6 dB, dotted line denotes criterion of 3 dB.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Histograms of absolute values of differences between SNRs determined in consecutive TEOAE measurements for the 4 frequency bands.

References

    1. Kemp DT, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleography – practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1986;25:71–95. - PubMed
    1. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Whitehead ML, Martin GK. Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(5):964–81. - PubMed
    1. Campos De P, Sanches SG, Hatzopoulos S, et al. Alteration of distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in subjects with a previous history of middle ear dysfunction. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(4):MT27–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ratyńska J, Grzanka A, Mueller-Malesińska M, et al. Correlations between risk factors for hearing impairment and TEOAE screening test outcome in neonates at risk for hearing loss. Scand Audiol Suppl. 2001;(52):15–17. - PubMed
    1. De Capua B, De Felice C, Costantini D, et al. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2003;23(1):16–20. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources