Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;63(1):130-5.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.13191. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

The Pittsburgh Fatigability scale for older adults: development and validation

Nancy W Glynn  1 , Adam J Santanasto, Eleanor M Simonsick, Robert M Boudreau, Scott R Beach, Richard Schulz, Anne B Newman
Affiliations

The Pittsburgh Fatigability scale for older adults: development and validation

Nancy W Glynn et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the development of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) and establish its reliability and concurrent and convergent validity against performance measures.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Participants: Scale development sample: 1,013 individuals aged 60 and older from two registries; validation sample: 483 adults aged 60 and older from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA).

Measurements: The scale development sample and BLSA participants self-administered an initial 26-item perceived fatigability scale. BLSA participants also completed measures of performance fatigability (perceived exertion from a standard treadmill task and performance deterioration from a fast-paced long-distance corridor walk), a 6-m usual-paced corridor walk, and five timed chair stands.

Results: Principal components analysis with varimax rotation reduced the 26-item scale to the 10-item PFS. The PFS showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.88) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation 0.86). In the validation sample, PFS scores, adjusted for age, sex, and race, were greater for those with high performance fatigability, slow gait speed, worse physical function, and lower fitness, with differences between high and low fatigability ranging from 3.2 to 5.1 points (P < .001).

Conclusion: The 10-item PFS physical fatigability score is a valid and reliable measure of perceived fatigability in older adults and can serve as an adjunct to performance-based fatigability measures for identifying older adults at risk of mobility limitation in clinical and research settings.

Keywords: fatigability; fatigue; mobility; performance measures; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

References

    1. Alexander NB, Taffet GE, Horne FM, et al. Bedside-to-bench conference: Research agenda for idiopathic fatigue and aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:967–975. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eldadah BA. Fatigue and fatigability in older adults. PM R. 2010;2:406–413. - PubMed
    1. Moreh E, Jacobs JM, Stessman J. Fatigue, function, and mortality in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65A:887–895. - PubMed
    1. Vestergaard S, Nayfield SG, Patel KV, et al. Fatigue in a representative population of older persons and its association with functional impairment, functional limitation, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64A:76–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hardy SE, Studenski SA. Fatigue and function over 3 years among older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63A:1389–1392. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types