Two closely spaced promoters are equally activated by a remote enhancer: evidence against a scanning model for enhancer action
- PMID: 2555780
- PMCID: PMC335104
- DOI: 10.1093/nar/17.22.8931
Two closely spaced promoters are equally activated by a remote enhancer: evidence against a scanning model for enhancer action
Abstract
To explain the activation of transcription by a remote enhancer, two models are most often considered, namely looping and scanning. A scanning model, also referred to as 'polymerase entry site' model predicts that for two adjacent promoters the one proximal to an enhancer would be preferentially activated. Preferential activation of the proximal promoter in a tandem promoter arrangement has been found before in several laboratories, including our own, but for technical reasons the data were inconclusive with regards to the enhancer mechanism. In the work presented here, we readdress the question of preferential promoter activation by an enhancer using a more clearly defined system. Two identical promoters were kept closeby in a divergent, or directly repeated orientation. The SV40 enhancer was placed at a great distance on one or the other side of the two promoters, to see whether the enhancer position influenced the relative efficiency of the two promoters in transfected cells. Our finding that the promoter usage is virtually unaffected by the enhancer position does not favor a scanning model, but is compatible with a looping model of enhancer action.
Similar articles
-
Long-range activation of transcription by SV40 enhancer is affected by "inhibitory" or "permissive" DNA sequences between enhancer and promoter.Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1989 Nov;15(6):591-603. doi: 10.1007/BF01534920. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1989. PMID: 2556801
-
A transcriptional terminator between enhancer and promoter does not affect remote transcriptional control.Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1990 Jul;16(4):351-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01232463. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1990. PMID: 2218723
-
Enhancer activation by a single type of transcription factor shows cell type dependence.EMBO J. 1991 Sep;10(9):2543-51. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07794.x. EMBO J. 1991. PMID: 1714381 Free PMC article.
-
An enhancer stimulates transcription in trans when attached to the promoter via a protein bridge.Cell. 1989 Aug 25;58(4):767-77. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90110-4. Cell. 1989. PMID: 2548735
-
A polyomavirus enhancer mutant confers ubiquitous high transcriptional efficiency to the SV40 late promoter.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Feb 6;207(1):339-47. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1193. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995. PMID: 7857287
Cited by
-
Upstream box/TATA box order is the major determinant of the direction of transcription.Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Dec 25;19(24):6699-704. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.24.6699. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991. PMID: 1762900 Free PMC article.
-
Polarity of transcriptional enhancement revealed by an insulator element.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19;97(26):14518-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.011529598. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000. PMID: 11114171 Free PMC article.
-
Regulatory Enhancer-Core-Promoter Communication via Transcription Factors and Cofactors.Trends Genet. 2016 Dec;32(12):801-814. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 2. Trends Genet. 2016. PMID: 27816209 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence that USF can interact with only a single general transcription complex at one time.Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1630-8. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1630-1638.1992. Mol Cell Biol. 1992. PMID: 1549117 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of sequences regulating larval expression of the Adh gene of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):763-71. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.3.763. Genetics. 1991. PMID: 1752419 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical