Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;18(3):119-25.
doi: 10.7874/kja.2014.18.3.119. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

The effects of unilateral tinnitus on auditory temporal resolution: gaps-in-noise performance

Yong-Hwi An  1 , So Young Jin  2 , Sang Won Yoon  1 , Hyun Joon Shim  1
Affiliations

The effects of unilateral tinnitus on auditory temporal resolution: gaps-in-noise performance

Yong-Hwi An et al. Korean J Audiol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test is a measure to assess auditory temporal resolution, which is the ability to follow rapid changes in the envelope of a sound stimulus over time. We investigated whether unilateral tinnitus affects temporal resolution by the GIN performance.

Subjects and methods: Hearing tests including the GIN test were performed in 120 ears of 60 patients with unilateral tinnitus who showed symmetric hearing within 20 dB HL difference up to 8 kHz (tinnitus-affected ears, 14.6±11.2 dB HL; non-tinnitus ears 15.1±11.5 dB HL) and 60 ears of 30 subjects with normal hearing. Comparisons were made between tinnitus and non-tinnitus side of patients and normal ears of controls.

Results: There was no significant difference of the mean GIN thresholds among tinnitus-affected ears (5.18±0.6 ms), non-tinnitus ears (4.98±0.6 ms) and normal ears (4.97±0.8 ms). The mean percentage of correct answers in tinnitus side (67.3±5.5%) was slightly less than that in non-tinnitus side (70.0±5.5%) but it was not significantly different from that in normal ears (69.4±7.5%). Neither the GIN threshold nor the GIN perception level in tinnitus ears has relation to sex, frequency and loudness of tinnitus, and audiometric data. Age only showed a significant correlation with the GIN performance.

Conclusions: We found no evidence which supported the influence of unilateral tinnitus on auditory temporal resolution. These results imply that tinnitus may not simply fill in the silent gaps in the background noise.

Keywords: Gaps-In-Noise test; Temporal resolution; Tinnitus; Unilateral.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Samples of three Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) segments demonstrating the duration of the stimuli, inter-stimulus intervals, and varying gap durations. Note that the GIN test is composed of a series of white noise containing 0 to 3 silent gaps per noise segment randomly.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual GIN thresholds of the tinnitus (A) and control groups (B) for tinnitus-affected (X), non-tinnitus (●), left normal (▵), and right normal (■) ears. There was no significant difference of distribution between two groups. GIN: Gaps-In-Noise.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) threshold between the tinnitus and control group. There was no significant difference of the mean GIN thresholds among tinnitus side and non-tinnitus side of the patients, and normal ears of control subjects.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of the Gaps-In-Noise percentage of correct identifications between the tinnitus and control group. The percentage of correct answers of tinnitus-affected ears was significantly lower than that of non-tinnitus ears (*p<0.05), but was not different from that of normal ears.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Psychometric functions for each gap duration and each ear for both the tinnitus and control group of subjects. There was a trend of lower percentages of 4 and 5 ms in tinnitus-affected ears than in non-tinnitus ears, but there was no significant difference of overall psychometric curve between two groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gelfand SA. Hearing: An introduction to psychological and physiological acoustics. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1998.
    1. Plack CJ, Viemeister NF. Suppression and the dynamic range of hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;93:976–982. - PubMed
    1. Schulte-Körne G, Deimel W, Bartling J, Remschmidt H. Role of auditory temporal processing for reading and spelling disability. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;86(3 Pt 1):1043–1047. - PubMed
    1. Zwicker E, Schorn K. Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients. Audiology. 1982;21:474–492. - PubMed
    1. Feng Y, Yin S, Kiefte M, Wang J. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2010;31:115–125. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources