Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb;12(2):91-9.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.346. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

Affiliations
Review

Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

Craig Comiter. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Surgery remains the most effective treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence. Over the past two decades, this surgery has evolved with respect to both operative technique and sling design, and various devices are now available that have different mechanisms of action, such as the artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling. The choice of device, however, should be individualized according to the circumstances of each patient. The optimal surgical treatment depends on a variety of patient-related factors, including the degree of urine leakage as assessed by incontinence pad weight test results, bladder contractility, urethral compliance, history of radiation exposure or prior incontinence surgery, and patient preference--given the choice, most patients opt for a sling procedure over an artificial sphincter to avoid implantation of a mechanical device. Athorough urodynamic evaluation is, therefore, necessary for the majority of patients. An artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling might be the most appropriate choice for a particular patient, depending on their specific urodynamic findings. Progress in this field continues, and several new devices are in development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Urol. 1987 Apr;137(4):668-71 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2000 Aug 1;56(2):317-9 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2010 Nov;58(5):767-72 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2007 Apr;177(4):1414-8 - PubMed
    1. BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(7):1012-6 - PubMed