Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May;172(9):2179-209.
doi: 10.1111/bph.13059. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Transdermal patches: history, development and pharmacology

Affiliations
Review

Transdermal patches: history, development and pharmacology

Michael N Pastore et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2015 May.

Abstract

Transdermal patches are now widely used as cosmetic, topical and transdermal delivery systems. These patches represent a key outcome from the growth in skin science, technology and expertise developed through trial and error, clinical observation and evidence-based studies that date back to the first existing human records. This review begins with the earliest topical therapies and traces topical delivery to the present-day transdermal patches, describing along the way the initial trials, devices and drug delivery systems that underpin current transdermal patches and their actives. This is followed by consideration of the evolution in the various patch designs and their limitations as well as requirements for actives to be used for transdermal delivery. The properties of and issues associated with the use of currently marketed products, such as variability, safety and regulatory aspects, are then described. The review concludes by examining future prospects for transdermal patches and drug delivery systems, such as the combination of active delivery systems with patches, minimally invasive microneedle patches and cutaneous solutions, including metered-dose systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Historical development of patches. Early topical products: (A) products from ancient times; (B) Galen's cold cream; (C) mercurial ointment; (D) mustard and belladonna plasters; controlled dosing of topical products. (E) First quantitative systemic delivery (Zondek's system). (F) Individualized delivery system: nitroglycerin ointment. (G) Topical delivery device (Wurster & Kramer's system). Passive non-invasive patches. (H) First patch system – the reservoir – introduced for scopolamine, nitroglycerin, clonidine and oestradiol. (I, J, K) Other types of patches – matrix and drug-in-adhesive (e.g. fentanyl and nicotine patches). Next-generation patches. (L) Cutaneous solutions (e.g. Patchless Patch®, Evamist®). (M) Active patches (e.g. iontophoresis, Zecuity®). (N) Minimally invasive patches (e.g. microneedles, Nanopatch®).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Manufacturing process for and potential failures of reservoir patches: (A) form-filling and sealing process; (B) coating and drying process; and (C) potential problems arising during patch reservoir manufacturing process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of commercial topical and transdermal patches – transdermal reservoir: originator, generic; transdermal matrix: originator, generic; transdermal active in adhesive only: originator, generic; topical patches; transdermal next generation; topical next generation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Transdermal delivery rate for currently marketed drugs in patches (log scale) (with symbol size being used to show the actual variation in molecular weight: 100 < MW < 200 Da; 200 ≤ MW < 300 Da; MW ≥ 300 Da) plotted against the active drug melting point (where unknown melting point given by an asterisk is represented as liquid at 25°C) and overlaid on the Berner–Cooper nomogram for a drug with a log P of 5 (Kydonieus et al., 1999). Also shown, as dashed black lines, are the estimated upper and lower boundary lines for marketed drug delivery rate from patches as defined by the rates for small (MW = 100), polar (log P = 1) and large (MW = 500), lipophilic (log P = 5) solutes respectively. [The dashed black lines are calculated from the expression: log maximum delivery rate (μg·cm−2·h−1) = 1.6 + log MW − 0.0086 MW − 0.01 (MP − 25) − 0.219 log P and is based on a regression of maximum transdermal flux (in nmol, equation 7) versus MP, MW and log P for the combined data set of Magnusson et al. (2004) (Milewski and Stinchcomb, 2012). The level region in this plot recognises that 25°C is an approximate lower skin surface temperature for patches applied to human skin in vivo and at which all drugs with MP < 25°C will be liquid.]
Figure 5
Figure 5
Typical active plasma concentration profile after patch application showing the lag-time, reaching and achieving steady-state, depletion and patch removal as well as the corresponding profile for repeated p.o. dosing of the same active.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams LS, Skee DM, Natarajan J, Wong FA, Anderson GD. Pharmacokinetics of a contraceptive patch (Evra/Ortho Evra) containing norelgestromin and ethinyloestradiol at four application sites. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53:141–146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acrux Ltd. 2014. Data estimated from the ‘US testosterone therapy market histogram’. Annual Report 2014 [Online]. Available at: http://www.acrux.com.au/IRM/Company/ShowPage.aspx/PDFs/1381-10000000/201... (accessed 10/28/2014)
    1. Ahmed SR, Boucher AE, Manni A, Santen RJ, Bartholomew M. Transdermal testosterone therapy in the treatment of male hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;66:546–551. - PubMed
    1. Aiache JM. Historique des emplâtres. Bull Tech Gattefossé. 1984;77:9–17.
    1. Ale I, Lachapelle J-M, Maibach HI. Skin tolerability associated with transdermal drug delivery systems: an overview. Adv Ther. 2009;26:920–935. - PubMed