Sequential compression device compliance in postoperative obstetrics and gynecology patients
- PMID: 25560099
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000554
Sequential compression device compliance in postoperative obstetrics and gynecology patients
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association of patient and nursing education on sequential compression device compliance in patients who have undergone major obstetric or benign gynecologic procedures.
Methods: We performed a prospective observational study on all English-speaking patients who underwent cesarean delivery or benign gynecologic surgery and were prescribed to wear sequential compression devices postoperatively at a university medical center. The 4-month study was divided into 1-month segments. The first month consisted of baseline observations of compliance. The second month was comprised of structured patient education, the third month involved nursing education, and the final month included both interventions. Observations were made twice daily. All educational interventions and observations were performed by two coauthors. A patient was noted to be compliant if she was ambulating, sitting, or lying in bed with sequential compression devices applied, tubing attached, and the machine powered on.
Results: A total of 859 observations was recorded for 228 patients. The number of hospitalization days ranged from 1 to 13 (mean 2.40 days, median 2 days). There was no difference in compliance among the months with 141 of 230 (61.3%), 106 of 194 (54.6%), 155 of 277 (56.0%), and 95 of 158 (60.1%) compliance for each consecutive month (P=.44). Noncompliance increased with each successive postoperative day (odds ratio 1.18 per day, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.30). The most common patient-stated reason for noncompliance was "the nurse said I don't need them anymore" (82/362 observations [22.6%]). Overall, cesarean delivery was associated with the lowest rate of compliance when compared with gynecologic surgeries (272/519 [52.4%] compared with 225/340 [66.2%], P<.001).
Conclusion: Compliance with postoperative use of sequential compression devices is approximately 58% and did not improve with patient or nursing educational interventions.
Level of evidence: III.
Comment in
-
Peripartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: where do we go from here?Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):16-18. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000619. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25560098 No abstract available.
References
-
- Clarke-Pearson DL, Abaid LN. Prevention of venous thromboembolism Events after surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:155–67.
-
- Andres RL, Miles A. Venous thromboembolism and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2001;28:613–30.
-
- Bonnar J. Can more be done in obstetric and gynecologic practice to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with venous thromboembolism? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:784–91.
-
- Silvertein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton JL III. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:585–93.
-
- Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ; American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel. Executive Summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141(suppl):7S–47S.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
