Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008403.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008403.pub3.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

Elvira C van Dalen  1 , Manou S de Lijster, Lieve Gj Leijssen, Erna Mc Michiels, Leontien Cm Kremer, Huib N Caron, Daniel C Aronson
Affiliations

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children

Elvira C van Dalen et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an accepted surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of benign diseases. Presently, the use of MIS in patients with cancer is progressing. However, the role of MIS in children with solid neoplasms is less clear than it is in adults. Although the use of diagnostic MIS to obtain biopsy specimens for pathology is accepted in paediatric surgical oncology, there is limited evidence to support the use of MIS for the resection of malignancies. This review is the second update of a previously published Cochrane review.

Objectives: To ascertain differences in outcome between the minimally invasive and open surgical approaches for the treatment of solid intra-abdominal or intra-thoracic neoplasms in children. The primary outcomes of interest are OS, EFS, port-site metastases and recurrence rate; the secondary outcome of interest is surgical morbidity.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1966 to February 2014) and EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to February 2014) to identify relevant studies. In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and the conference proceedings of the International Society for Paediatric Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology from 2003 to 2013. On 1 May 2014 we scanned the ISRCTN Register (on www.controlled-trials.com), the National Institutes of Health register (on www.controlled-trials.com and www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (on www.apps.who.int/trialsearch) for ongoing trials.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing MIS to open surgery for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children (aged 0 to 18 years) were considered for inclusion.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors performed the study selection independently.

Main results: The literature search retrieved 542 references. After screening the titles and abstracts we excluded 534 references which clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria. We assessed eight full text studies for eligibility and all of these studies were excluded from the review because they were not RCTs or CCTs. These excluded studies included case series, retrospective chart reviews and retrospective cohort studies. The scanning of reference lists and conference proceedings did not identify any additional studies and no (ongoing trials) were identified by the searches of trial registries. No studies that met the inclusion criteria of this review were identified

Authors' conclusions: No RCTs or CCTs evaluating MIS for the treatment of solid intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal neoplasms in children could be identified. The current evidence base informing the use of MIS in children with solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms is based on other study designs like case reports, retrospective chart reviews and cohort studies and should be interpreted with caution. Thus there is insufficient evidence to allow any definitive conclusions regarding the use of MIS in these patients. High quality RCTs comparing MIS to open surgery are required. To accomplish this, centres specialising in MIS in children should collaborate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Duarte 2006 {published data only}
    1. Duarte RJ, Dénes FT, Cristofani LM, Odone‐Filho V, Srougi M. Further experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy for Wilms' tumour after chemotherapy. BJU International 2006;98(1):155‐9. - PubMed
Ehrlich 2002 {published data only}
    1. Ehrlich PF, Newman KD, Haase GM, Lobe TE, Wiener ES, Holcomb GW. Lessons learned from a multi‐institutional randomized controlled study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2002;37(3):431‐6. - PubMed
Iwanaka 2004 {published data only}
    1. Iwanaka T, Arai M, Kawashima H, Kudou S, Fujishiro J, Imaizumi S, et al. Endosurgical procedures for pediatric solid tumors. Pediatric Surgery International 2004;20(1):39‐42. - PubMed
Kelleher 2013 {published data only}
    1. Kelleher CM, Smithson L, Nguyen LL, Casadiego G, Nasr A, Irwin MS, et al. Clinical outcomes in children with adrenal neuroblastoma undergoing open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2013;48(8):1727‐32. - PubMed
Malek 2010 {published data only}
    1. Malek MM, Mollen KP, Kane TD, Shah SR, Irwin C. Thoracic neuroblastoma: a retrospective review of our institutional experience with comparison of the thoracoscopic and open approaches to resection. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2010;45(8):1622‐6. - PubMed
Shanberg 2006 {published data only}
    1. Shanberg AM, Perer E, Matsunaga G. Re: Laparoscopic nephrectomy for Wilms tumor after chemotherapy: initial experience. Journal of Urology 2006;175(2):788. - PubMed
Stanford 2002 {published data only}
    1. Stanford A, Upperman JS, Nguyen N, Barksdale E Jr, Wiener ES. Surgical management of open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: outcome analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2002;37(7):1027‐9. - PubMed
Wu 2013 {published data only}
    1. Wu Z, Zhou J, Wang X, Li YB, Niu T, Peng B. Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;19(24):3854‐60. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Al‐Shanafey 2008
    1. Al‐Shanafey S, Habib Z. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in children: special emphasis on neoplastic lesions. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A 2008;18(2):306‐9. - PubMed
Bax 2005
    1. Bax NM. Laparoscopic surgery in infants and children. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2005;15(5):319‐24. - PubMed
Berends 1994
    1. Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 1994;344(8914):58. - PubMed
Buunen 2009
    1. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long‐term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncology 2009;10(1):44‐52. - PubMed
Castilho 2002
    1. Castilho LN, Castillo OA, Dénes FT, Mitre AI, Arap S. Laparoscopic adrenal surgery in children. Journal of Urology 2002;168(1):221‐4. - PubMed
Duarte 2009
    1. Duarte RJ, Denez FT, Cristofani LM, Srougi M. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for Wilms' tumor. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 2009;9(6):753‐61. - PubMed
Georgeson 2000
    1. Georgeson KE, Owings E. Advances in minimally invasive surgery in children. American Journal of Surgery 2000;180(5):362‐4. - PubMed
Georgeson 2003
    1. Georgeson K. Minimally invasive surgery in neonates. Seminars in Neonatology 2003;8(3):243‐8. - PubMed
Johnson 1997
    1. Johnson A. Laparoscopic surgery. Lancet 1997;349(9052):631‐5. - PubMed
Lacy 2002
    1. Lacy AM, García‐Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy‐assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;359(9325):2224‐9. - PubMed
Leclair 2007
    1. Leclair MD, Sarnacki S, Varlet F, Heloury Y. Minimally‐invasive surgery in cancer children [Vidéochirurgie et cancer de l'enfant]. Bulletin du Cancer 2007;94(12):1087‐90. - PubMed
Leung 2004
    1. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 2004;363(9416):1187‐92. - PubMed
Liang 2008
    1. Liang Y, Li G, Chen P, Yu J. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer: a meta‐analysis of results of randomized controlled trials on recurrence. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2008;34(11):1217‐24. - PubMed
Metzelder 2007
    1. Metzelder ML, Kuebler JF, Shimotakahara A, Glueer S, Grigull L, Ure BM. Role of diagnostic and ablative minimally invasive surgery for pediatric malignancies. Cancer 2007;109(11):2343‐8. - PubMed
Milsom 1998
    1. Milsom JW, Böhm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1998;187(1):46‐54. - PubMed
Saenz 1997
    1. Saenz NC, Conlon KC, Aronson DC, LaQuaglia MP. The application of minimal access procedures in infants, children, and young adults with pediatric malignancies. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A 1997;7(5):289‐94. - PubMed
Sailhamer 2003
    1. Sailhamer E, Jackson CC, Vogel AM, Kang S, Wu Y, Chwals WJ, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for pediatric solid neoplasms. American Surgeon 2003;69(7):566‐8. - PubMed
Schmidt 2007
    1. Schmidt AI, Engelmann C, Till H, Kellnar S, Ure BM. Minimally‐invasive pediatric surgery in 2004: a survey including 50 German institutions. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2007;42(9):1491‐4. - PubMed
Song 2009
    1. Song SY, Na KJ, Oh SG, Ahn BH. Learning curves of minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. European Journal of Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery 2009;35(4):689‐93. - PubMed
Spurbeck 2004
    1. Spurbeck WW, Davidoff AM, Lobe TE, Rao BN, Schropp KP, Shochat SJ. Minimally invasive surgery in pediatric cancer patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2004;11(3):340‐3. - PubMed
Ure 2000
    1. Ure BM, Bax NM, Zee DC. Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2000;35(8):1170‐3. - PubMed
Varlet 2009
    1. Varlet F, Stephan JL, Guye E, Allary R, Berger C, Lopez M. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for unilateral renal cancer in children. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 2009;19(2):148‐52. - PubMed
Warmann 2003
    1. Warmann S, Fuchs J, Jesch NK, Schrappe M, Ure BM. A prospective study of minimally invasive techniques in pediatric surgical oncology: preliminary report. Medical and Pediatric Oncology 2003;40(3):155‐7. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

De Lijster 2010
    1. Lijster MS, Bergevoet RM, Dalen EC, Michiels EMC, Caron HN, Kremer LCM, et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008403] - DOI - PubMed
De Lijster 2012
    1. Lijster MS, Bergevoet RM, Dalen EC, Michiels EMC, Caron HN, Kremer LCM, et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for the treatment of solid abdominal and thoracic neoplasms in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008403.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources