Ethical obligations and clinical goals in end-of-life care: deriving a quality-of-life construct based on the Islamic concept of accountability before God (taklīf)
- PMID: 25562214
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.974769
Ethical obligations and clinical goals in end-of-life care: deriving a quality-of-life construct based on the Islamic concept of accountability before God (taklīf)
Abstract
End-of-life medical decision making presents a major challenge to patients and physicians alike. In order to determine whether it is ethically justifiable to forgo medical treatment in such scenarios, clinical data must be interpreted alongside patient values, as well as in light of the physician's ethical commitments. Though much has been written about this ethical issue from religious perspectives (especially Christian and Jewish), little work has been done from an Islamic point of view. To fill the gap in the literature around Islamic bioethical perspectives on the matter, we derive a theologically rooted rubric for goals of care. We use the Islamic obligation for Muslims to seek medical treatment as the foundation for determining the clinical conditions under which Muslim physicians have a duty to treat. We next link the theological concept of accountability before God (taklīf) to quality-of-life assessment. Using this construct, we suggest that a Muslim physician is not obligated to maintain or continue clinical treatment when patients who were formerly of, or had the potential to be, mukallaf (the term for a person who has taklīf), are now not expected to regain that status by means of continued clinical treatment.
Keywords: Islamic bioethics; end-of-life issues; life-sustaining treatment; mukallaf.
Comment in
-
The determination of quality of life and medical futility in disorders of consciousness: reinterpreting the moral code of Islam.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):14-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.975578. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562215 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Islamic theology's contribution to medical decision making in end-of-life care.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):17-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.974775. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562216 No abstract available.
-
Exploring a new concept at the end of life: accountability before god (mukallaf).Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.975577. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562217 No abstract available.
-
Normativity of heterogeneity in clinical ethics.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):21-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.974781. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562218 No abstract available.
-
Precaution (ihtiyāt): do not proceed.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):23-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.974777. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562219 No abstract available.
-
A worrisome misappropriation of "mukallaf" in life-sustaining treatment.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.974776. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562220 No abstract available.
-
Islamic bioethics at the end of life: why mukallaf status cannot be the criterion of defining the life that should be saved.Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):27-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.974780. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562221 No abstract available.
-
Islamic goals for clinical treatment at the end of life: the concept of accountability before God (taklīf) remains useful: response to open peer commentaries on "Ethical obligations and clinical goals in end-of-life care: deriving a quality-of-life construct based on the Islamic concept of accountability before God (taklīf)".Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(1):W1-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.983353. Am J Bioeth. 2015. PMID: 25562245 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous