Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Jan 6;313(1):45-53.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16107.

Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality

Affiliations
Observational Study

Association between 7 years of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes and long-term mortality

Writing Group for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Whether mortality in type 1 diabetes mellitus is affected following intensive glycemic therapy has not been established.

Objective: To determine whether mortality differed between the original intensive and conventional treatment groups in the long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) cohort.

Design, setting, and participants: After the DCCT (1983-1993) ended, participants were followed up in a multisite (27 US and Canadian academic clinical centers) observational study (Epidemiology of Diabetes Control and Complications [EDIC]) until December 31, 2012. Participants were 1441 healthy volunteers with diabetes mellitus who, at baseline, were 13 to 39 years of age with 1 to 15 years of diabetes duration and no or early microvascular complications, and without hypertension, preexisting cardiovascular disease, or other potentially life-threatening disease.

Interventions and exposures: During the clinical trial, participants were randomly assigned to receive intensive therapy (n = 711) aimed at achieving glycemia as close to the nondiabetic range as safely possible, or conventional therapy (n = 730) with the goal of avoiding symptomatic hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. At the end of the DCCT, after a mean of 6.5 years, intensive therapy was taught and recommended to all participants and diabetes care was returned to personal physicians.

Main outcomes and measures: Total and cause-specific mortality was assessed through annual contact with family and friends and through records over 27 years' mean follow-up.

Results: Vital status was ascertained for 1429 (99.2%) participants. There were 107 deaths, 64 in the conventional and 43 in the intensive group. The absolute risk difference was -109 per 100,000 patient-years (95% CI, -218 to -1), with lower all-cause mortality risk in the intensive therapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46-0.99]; P = .045). Primary causes of death were cardiovascular disease (24 deaths; 22.4%), cancer (21 deaths; 19.6%), acute diabetes complications (19 deaths; 17.8%), and accidents or suicide (18 deaths; 16.8%). Higher levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 1.56 [95% CI, 1.35-1.81 per 10% relative increase in HbA1c]; P < .001), as well as the development of albuminuria (HR = 2.20 [95% CI, 1.46-3.31]; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: After a mean of 27 years' follow-up of patients with type 1 diabetes, 6.5 years of initial intensive diabetes therapy was associated with a modestly lower all-cause mortality rate when compared with conventional therapy.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00360815 and NCT00360893.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative incidence of mortality from the date of randomization in the DCCT (starting in 1983) to December 31, 2012 with estimates of the Hazard Ratio, 95% confidence limits and p-value obtained from a Cox Proportional Hazards model. A) For males versus females, HR = 1.61 (1.09, 2.39), p = 0.02. B) For the intensive versus conventional treatment groups (intent-to-treat analysis), HR = 0.67 (0.46, 0.99), p = 0.045.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative incidence of mortality from the date of randomization in the DCCT (starting in 1983) to December 31, 2012 with estimates of the Hazard Ratio, 95% confidence limits and p-value obtained from a Cox Proportional Hazards model. A) For males versus females, HR = 1.61 (1.09, 2.39), p = 0.02. B) For the intensive versus conventional treatment groups (intent-to-treat analysis), HR = 0.67 (0.46, 0.99), p = 0.045.

Comment in

References

    1. Borch-Johnsen K, Kreiner S, Deckert T. Mortality of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Denmark: a study of relative mortality in 2930 Danish type 1 diabetic patients diagnosed from 1933 to 1972. Diabetologia. 1986;29(11):767–772. - PubMed
    1. Harjutsalo V, Forsblom C, Groop PH. Time trends in mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes: nationwide population based cohort study. BMJ. 2011 Sep 8;343:d5364. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skrivarhaug T, Bangstad HJ, Stene LC, Sandvik L, Hanssen KF, Joner G. Long-term mortality in a nationwide cohort of childhood-onset type 1 diabetic patients in Norway. Diabetologia. 2006;49(2):298–305. - PubMed
    1. Soedamah-Muthu SS, Fuller JH, Mulnier HE, Raleigh VS, Lawrenson RA, Colhoun HM. All-cause mortality rates in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared with a non-diabetic population from the UK general practice research database, 1992–1999. Diabetologia. 2006;49:660–666. - PubMed
    1. Shankar A, Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE. Association between glycosylated hemoglobin level and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in type 1 diabetes. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(4):393–402. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data