Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 30;2(4):201-16.
doi: 10.3390/jpm2040201.

Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine

Affiliations

Insurance coverage policies for personalized medicine

Andrew Hresko et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Adoption of personalized medicine in practice has been slow, in part due to the lack of evidence of clinical benefit provided by these technologies. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of personalized medicine. Insurers consider a variety of factors when formulating medical coverage policies for personalized medicine, including the overall strength of evidence for a test, availability of clinical guidelines and health technology assessments by independent organizations. In this study, we reviewed coverage policies of the largest U.S. insurers for genomic (disease-related) and pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests to determine the extent that these tests were covered and the evidence basis for the coverage decisions. We identified 41 coverage policies for 49 unique testing: 22 tests for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk and 27 PGx tests. Fifty percent (or less) of the tests reviewed were covered by insurers. Lack of evidence of clinical utility appears to be a major factor in decisions of non-coverage. The inclusion of PGx information in drug package inserts appears to be a common theme of PGx tests that are covered. This analysis highlights the variability of coverage determinations and factors considered, suggesting that the adoption of personal medicine will affected by numerous factors, but will continue to be slowed due to lack of demonstrated clinical benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Deverka P.A. Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers. Public Health Genomics. 2009;12:149–157. doi: 10.1159/000189627. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deverka P.A., Schully S.D., Ishibe N., Carlson J.J., Freedman A., Goddard K.A., Khoury M.J., Ramsey S.D. Stakeholder assessment of the evidence for cancer genomic tests: Insights from three case studies. Genet. Med. 2012;14:7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frueh F.W. Real-world clinical effectiveness, regulatory transparency and payer coverage: Three ingredients for translating pharmacogenomics into clinical practice. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:657–660. doi: 10.2217/pgs.10.46. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulman K.A., Vidal A.V., Ackerly D.C. Personalized medicine and disruptive innovation: Implications for technology assessment. Genet. Med. 2009;11:577–581. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ae0935. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scott S.A. Personalizing medicine with clinical pharmacogenetics. Genet. Med. 2011;13:987–995. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318238b38c. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources