Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;2(1):32-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00059.x. Epub 2009 Jan 7.

Evolutionary ecology of microbial wars: within-host competition and (incidental) virulence

Affiliations

Evolutionary ecology of microbial wars: within-host competition and (incidental) virulence

Sam P Brown et al. Evol Appl. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Invading an occupied niche is a formidable ecological challenge, and one of particular human importance in the context of food-borne microbial pathogens. We discuss distinct categories of invader-triggered environmental change that facilitate invasion by emptying their niche of competitors. Evidence is reviewed that gut bacteria use such strategies to manipulate their environment (via bacteriocins, temperate phage viruses or immuno-manipulation) at the expense of their competitors are reviewed. The possible virulence implications of microbial warfare among multiple co-infecting strains are diverse. Killing competitors can reduce virulence by reducing overall microbial densities, or increase virulence if for example the allelopathic mechanism involves immuno-manipulation. Finally, we place microbial anti-competitor strategies in a social evolution framework, highlighting how costly anti-competitor strategies can be understood as examples of microbial spite. We conclude by discussing other invasive species that have also developed such proactive strategies of invasion.

Keywords: disease biology; evolutionary theory; microbial biology; social evolution; virulence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagrams of (a) chemical, (b) viral and (c) immuno-manipulative weapons of mass microbial destruction. Squares represent microbial densities of competing weapons-carriers (C) and susceptibles (S). Circles represent the density of ‘weapon’, the agent of environmental change (B for bacteriocin, or other chemical toxin, V for temperate phage virus, and T for immuno-provocative toxin). The cylinder represents a multicellular host, the subject of immuno-manipulation by T. Pointed arrows represent a positive relationship (e.g. C increase the density of B), flat arrows represent a negative relationship (e.g. B decrease the density of S).

References

    1. Adams MH. Bacteriophages. London: Interscience Publishers Ltd; 1959.
    1. Alizon S, Van Baalen M. Multiple infections, immune dynamics and the evolution of virulence. American Naturalist. 2008;172:E150–E168. - PubMed
    1. Van Baalen M, Jansen VAA. Dangerous liaisons: the ecology of private interest and common good. Oikos. 2001;95:211–224.
    1. Billings WD. Ecology, Management and Restoration of Inter-Mountain Annual Rangelands. Ogdon Utah: US Forest Service; 1993.
    1. Bossi L, Fuentes JA, Mora G, Figueroa-Bossi N. Prophage contribution to bacterial population dynamics. Journal of Bacteriology. 2003;185:6467–6471. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources