Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;3(3):305-18.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00121.x. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

Populations of weedy crop-wild hybrid beets show contrasting variation in mating system and population genetic structure

Affiliations

Populations of weedy crop-wild hybrid beets show contrasting variation in mating system and population genetic structure

Jean-François Arnaud et al. Evol Appl. 2010 May.

Abstract

Reproductive traits are key parameters for the evolution of invasiveness in weedy crop-wild hybrids. In Beta vulgaris, cultivated beets hybridize with their wild relatives in the seed production areas, giving rise to crop-wild hybrid weed beets. We investigated the genetic structure, the variation in first-year flowering and the variation in mating system among weed beet populations occurring within sugar beet production fields. No spatial genetic structure was found for first-year populations composed of F1 crop-wild hybrid beets. In contrast, populations composed of backcrossed weed beets emerging from the seed bank showed a strong isolation-by-distance pattern. Whereas gametophytic self-incompatibility prevents selfing in wild beet populations, all studied weed beet populations had a mixed-mating system, plausibly because of the introgression of the crop-derived Sf gene that disrupts self-incompatibility. No significant relationship between outcrossing rate and local weed beet density was found, suggesting no trends for a shift in the mating system because of environmental effects. We further reveal that increased invasiveness of weed beets may stem from positive selection on first-year flowering induction depending on the B gene inherited from the wild. Finally, we discuss the practical and applied consequences of our findings for crop-weed management.

Keywords: Beta vulgaris; genetic structure; invasive species; outcrossing rate; timing of flowering; weediness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variation in the average kinship coefficient (Fij) between pairs of weed beet individuals according to (log-transformed) geographical distance for populations A, B, C and D. Ten distance classes were defined in such a way that the number of pairwise comparisons within each distance interval was constant. Dashed lines depict the 95% (two-tailed) confidence interval for the null hypothesis of complete spatial randomness of genotypes. Sp statistics and their significance are also indicated for each population. NS, nonsignificant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Variation in first-year flowering (bolting rate) and population-level outcrossing rate (tm) in weed beets for populations A, B, C and D. Bolting rates were estimated in the greenhouse after 28 weeks in noninductive conditions (temperature ranging from 18.5 to 30.5°C; 16 h/8 h day/night period). The vertical error bars refer to the standard errors for both rates. (B) Variation in bolting rate and individual-level outcrossing rate (tm) according to weed beet classification: ‘in-row bolters’ found within the row of cultivation and ‘out-row bolters’ found outside the row of cultivation. The vertical error bars refer to the standard errors for both rates.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between individual-level outcrossing rates (tm) and the local density measured as the number of flowering plants within a radius of 20 m around each individual within populations A, B, C and D. Correlation coefficients associated with regression lines are equal to 0.201, −0.132, 0.268 and 0.062 for population A, B, C and D respectively. Logistic regressions suggested no effect of local density on individual outcrossing rates (all at P > 0.05 with χ21 = 0.51, 0.23, 0.82 and 0.18 for population A, B, C and D respectively).

References

    1. Arnaud J-F, Viard F, Delescluse M, Cuguen J. Evidence for gene flow via seed dispersal from crop to wild relatives in Beta vulgaris (Chenopodiaceae): consequences for the release of genetically modified crop species with weedy lineages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 2003;270:1565–1571. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnaud J-F, Fénart S, Godé C, Deledicque S, Touzet P, Cuguen J. Fine-scale geographical structure of genetic diversity in inland wild beet populations. Molecular Ecology. 2009;18:3201–3215. - PubMed
    1. Baker HG. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics. 1974;5:1–24.
    1. Barrett SCH, Colautti RI, Eckert CG. Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology. 2008;17:373–383. - PubMed
    1. Born C, Kjellberg F, Chevallier M-H, Vignes H, Dikangadissi J-T, Sanguié J, Wickings EJ. Colonization processes and the maintenance of genetic diversity: insights from a pioneer rainforest tree, Aucoumea klaineana. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 2008;275:2171–2179. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources