Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;4(2):315-25.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00171.x.

Incorporating evolutionary principles into environmental management and policy

Affiliations

Incorporating evolutionary principles into environmental management and policy

Richard Lankau et al. Evol Appl. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

As policymakers and managers work to mitigate the effects of rapid anthropogenic environmental changes, they need to consider organisms' responses. In light of recent evidence that evolution can be quite rapid, this now includes evolutionary responses. Evolutionary principles have a long history in conservation biology, and the necessary next step for the field is to consider ways in which conservation policy makers and managers can proactively manipulate evolutionary processes to achieve their goals. In this review, we aim to illustrate the potential conservation benefits of an increased understanding of evolutionary history and prescriptive manipulation of three basic evolutionary factors: selection, variation, and gene flow. For each, we review and propose ways that policy makers and managers can use evolutionary thinking to preserve threatened species, combat pest species, or reduce undesirable evolutionary changes. Such evolution-based management has potential to be a highly efficient and consistent way to create greater ecological resilience to widespread, rapid, and multifaceted environmental change.

Keywords: conservation biology; environmental management; evolution; gene flow; selection; variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Past environments provide the evolutionary history that shapes traits, plasticity, and genetic variation. Traits and plasticity along with novel environments (that might match or mismatch past environments) influence individual fitness that governs population performance. Fitness and genetic variation along with population size and connectivity drive evolution that feeds back to determine future traits, plasticity, and genetic variation. These, in turn, loop back to influence future fitness and population performance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The link between the spatial scale of evolutionary environmental management actions and the level of decision making at which they initially should be considered is illustrated with examples from Table 1. An imagined species range is shown, consisting of three distinct regional populations and within these a set of local populations. The species range spans regional or national administrative boundaries (stippled lines), highlighting the need for international or interstate consideration of evolutionary management actions. The change in underlying color illustrates an environmental selection gradient, e.g. temperature.

References

    1. Ackerly DD. Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2003;164:S165–S184.
    1. Ashley MV, Willson MF, Pergams ORW, O'Dowd DJ, Gende SM, Brown JS. Evolutionarily enlightened management. Biological Conservation. 2003;111:115–123.
    1. Baskett ML, Levin SA, Gaines SD, Dushoff J. Marine reserve design and the evolution of size at maturation in harvested fish. Ecological Applications. 2005;15:882–901.
    1. Beier P, Noss RF. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conservation Biology. 1998;12:1241–1252.
    1. Beier P, Majka DR, Spencer WD. Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conservation Biology. 2008;22:836–851. - PubMed