Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Oct;68(5):339-44.
doi: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.339-344. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation with Pre Induction IV Fentanyl Versus Combination of IV Fentanyl and Sub Lingual Nitroglycerin Spray

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation with Pre Induction IV Fentanyl Versus Combination of IV Fentanyl and Sub Lingual Nitroglycerin Spray

Vijayalakshmi B Channaiah et al. Med Arch. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Endotracheal intubation is one of the most invasive stimuli in anesthesia and it's often accompanied by a hemodynamic pressor response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a single pre-induction 2 µg/kg bolus injection of fentanyl followed by two puffs of nitroglycerin sub lingual spray (400 µg /spray) with a thiopentone/suxamethonium sequence in the attenuation of the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in normotensive patients.

Material and methods: The study consisted of 80 randomly selected ASA physical status I/II male/female adults who were aged between 18 through 60 years and scheduled for elective surgery. Group I received a single 2 µg/kg IV bolus of fentanyl diluted to 5 ml with normal saline 5 min prior to laryngoscopy followed by two puffs of nitroglycerin sub lingual spray (400 µg/spray) 2 minutes prior to intubation (n=40). Group II received a single 2 µg/kg IV bolus of fentanyl diluted to 5 ml with normal saline 5 min prior to laryngoscopy (n=40). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and rate pressure product were compared to basal values at pre-induction, induction, intubation and post-intubation as well as at time increments of 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 min.

Results: Fentanyl combined with nitroglycerin did not attenuate hemodynamic pressor responses more than fentanyl alone. Increases of HR (7.9%), DBP (4.0%), MAP (3.6%) and RPP (6.0%) along with attenuation of SBP (2.7%) were observed in the fentanyl-nitroglycerin group as compared to the equivalent control measured values.

Conclusions: A single pre-induction bolus injection of fentanyl followed by two puffs of nitroglycerin sub lingual spray in a thiopentone/suxamethonium anesthetic sequence neither successfully attenuates nor successfully suppresses the hemodynamic pressor response more effectively than fentanyl alone in normotensive patients resulting from endotracheal intubation.

Keywords: attenuation; endotracheal intubation; fentanyl; hemodynamic response; nitroglycerin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: NONE DECLARED.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A – mean HR values for control and nitroglycerin-fentanyl groups ± SD and B – percent difference between measured HR levels and basal values.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A – mean SBP values for control and nitroglycerin-fentanyl groups ± SD and B – percent difference between measured SBP levels and basal values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A – mean DBP values for control and nitroglycerin-fentanyl groups ± SD, B – percent difference between measured DBP levels and basal values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A – mean MAP values for control and nitroglycerin-fentanyl groups ± SD, B – percent difference between measured MAP levels and basal values.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A – mean RPP values for control and nitroglycerin-fentanyl groups ± SD, B – percent difference between measured RPP levels and basal values.

References

    1. Kayhan Z, Aldemir D, Mutlu H, Öğűşş E. Which is responsible for the haemodynamic response due to laryngoscopy and endotrachael indubation? Catecholamines, vasopressin or angiotensin? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:708–15. - PubMed
    1. Prys-Roberts C, Greene LT, Meloche R, Foëx P. Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. II. Haemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1971;43:531–47. - PubMed
    1. Kovac AL. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:63–79. - PubMed
    1. Safavi M, Honarmand A, Azari N. Attenuation of the pressor response to tracheal intubation in severe preeclampsia: relative efficacies of nitroglycerin infusion, sublingual nifedipene, and intravenous hydralazine. Anesth.Pain. 2011;1:81–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Vichitvejpaisal P, Gaines GY, White PF. Comparative effects of lidocaine, esmolol, and nitroglycerin in modifying the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Feb;7:5–8. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources