Point of view
- PMID: 25569525
- PMCID: PMC4367956
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000742
Point of view
Comment on
-
Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):77-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000691. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. PMID: 25575084 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC, van Zwet EW, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Peul WC Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;347:f6415. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Puzzilli F, Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Neroni M, Panagiotopoulos K, Bolognini A, Callovini G, Agrillo U, Alfieri A. Interspinousspacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;124:166–74. - PubMed
-
- Strömqvist BH, Berg S, Gerdhem P, Johnsson R, Möller A, Sahlstrand T, Soliman A, Tullberg T. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 Aug 1;38(17):1436–42. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical