Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:274679.
doi: 10.1155/2014/274679. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

Detection of influenza virus infection using two PCR methods

Affiliations

Detection of influenza virus infection using two PCR methods

Richard K Zimmerman et al. Adv Virol. 2014.

Abstract

Rapid, accurate, and cost-effective methods to identify the cause of respiratory tract infections are needed to maximize clinical benefit. Outpatients with acute respiratory illness were tested for influenza using a singleplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (SRT-PCR) method. A multiplex RT-PCR (MRT-PCR) method tested for influenza and 17 other viruses and was compared with SRT-PCR using chi-square tests. Among 935 patients, 335 (36%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B using SRT-PCR. Using MRT-PCR, 320 (34.2%) tested positive for influenza A and influenza B. This study supports MRT-PCR as a comparable method for detecting influenza among patients seeking outpatient care for acute respiratory illnesses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pierce V. M., Hodinka R. L. Comparison of the GenMark diagnostics eSensor respiratory viral panel to real-time PCR for detection of respiratory viruses in children. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2012;50(11):3458–3465. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01384-12. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choudhary M. L., Anand S. P., Heydari M., Rane G., Potdar V. A., Chadha M. S., Mishra A. C. Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR. Journal of Virological Methods. 2013;189(1):15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orenstein E. W., de Serres G., Haber M. J., et al. Methodologic issues regarding the use of three observational study designs to assess influenza vaccine effectiveness. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2007;36(3):623–631. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Treanor J. J., Talbot H. K., Ohmit S. E., Coleman L. A., Thompson M. G., Cheng P.-Y., Petrie J. G., Lofthus G., Meece J. K., Williams J. V., Berman L., Breese Hall C., Monto A. S., Griffin M. R., Belongia E., Shay D. K. Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States during a season with circulation of all three vaccine strains. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012;55(7):951–959. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis574. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Early estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness—United States, January 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2013;62:32–35. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources