Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):103-7.
doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.832. eCollection 2014 Dec.

Critical issues in the teaching of responsible writing

Affiliations

Critical issues in the teaching of responsible writing

Miguel Roig. J Microbiol Biol Educ. .

Abstract

In this paper I identify some of the more common, problematic writing practices (e.g., plagiarism, selective reporting of literature, and/or results, 'spin') found in traditional journal articles, along with associated variables, and suggest ways to correct them. The primary aim of the discussion is to emphasize the cultivation of transparency, excellence in scholarship, and a 'best practices' approach to disseminating the results of our research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andreescu L. Self-plagiarism in academic publishing: the anatomy of a misnomer. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19:775–797. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9416-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beall J. Is the Editor of the Springer Journal Scientometrics indifferent to plagiarism? Scholarly Open Access. 2014. [Online.] http://scholarlyoa.com/2014/03/06/is-the-editor-of-the-springer-journal-...
    1. Bird SJ. Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: what is the problem? Sci Eng Ethics. 2002;8:543–544. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0007-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonnell DA, et al. Recycling is not always good: the dangers of self-plagiarism. ACS Nano. 2012;6:1–4. doi: 10.1021/nn3000912. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruton SV. Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: legitimate forms of research misconduct. Account Res. 2014;21:176–197. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.848071. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources