Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):135-8.
doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.841. eCollection 2014 Dec.

(The Ethics of) Teaching Science and Ethics: A Collaborative Proposal

Affiliations

(The Ethics of) Teaching Science and Ethics: A Collaborative Proposal

William P Kabasenche. J Microbiol Biol Educ. .

Abstract

I offer a normative argument for a collaborative approach to teaching ethical issues in the sciences. Teaching science ethics requires expertise in at least two knowledge domains-the relevant science(s) and philosophical ethics. Accomplishing the aims of ethics education, while ensuring that science ethics discussions remain grounded in the best empirical science, can generally best be done through collaboration between a scientist and an ethicist. Ethics as a discipline is in danger of being misrepresented or distorted if presented by someone who lacks appropriate disciplinary training and experience. While there are exceptions, I take philosophy to be the most appropriate disciplinary domain in which to gain training in ethics teaching. Science students, who must be prepared to engage with many science ethics issues, are poorly served if their education includes a misrepresentation of ethics or specific issues. Students are less well prepared to engage specific issues in science ethics if they lack an appreciation of the resources the discipline of ethics provides. My collaborative proposal looks at a variety of ways scientists and ethicists might collaborate in the classroom to foster good science ethics education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chappell T. On the very idea of criteria for personhood. Southern J Philosophy. 2011;49:1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2010.00042.x. - DOI
    1. Frank A. A problem like no other: science and politics. Cosmos and culture. Jun 10, 2014. [Online.] http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2014/06/10/320634230/a-problem-like-no-oth....
    1. Harris J. The concept of the person and the value of life. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999;9:293–308. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kagan S. Normative ethics. Westview Press; Boulder, CO: 1998.
    1. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical issues in human stem cell research. Sep, 1999. posting date. [Online.] https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/nbac/pubs.html. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources