Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence
- PMID: 25576468
- PMCID: PMC4409491
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2580-x
Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The objective was to compare midurethral sling (MUS) urinary outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) only versus mixed UI (MUI).
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent primary MUS surgery for SUI. MUI was defined as at least "moderately" bothersome urgency and stress incontinence on the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20). The primary outcome was SUI cure defined by a response of "no," "not at all," or "somewhat" bothersome SUI on both of the two UDI-6 stress subscale items. Symptom impact was assessed using the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7). Multivariable models assessed the effect of MUI on SUI outcomes.
Results: One thousand one hundred and ninety-one primary MUS procedures were reviewed. Seven hundred and fifteen out of 1,191 (60%) questionnaires were returned and 534 out of 715 (75%) had completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Mean (± SD) follow-up time was 35 ± 15 months. Women with MUI had a higher (worse) baseline total score on the UDI-6 (p ≤ 0.001). A lower proportion of women with MUI had SUI success compared with the SUI only group (64 vs 84.5%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, women in the MUI group were at an increased risk of SUI failure (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6, 4.0), but greater improvements in UDI-6 (-31.6 ± 30.6 vs -15.5 ± 25.1), and UIQ-7 scores (-21.7 ± 35.3 vs -15.1 ± 28.2) compared with women with SUI only (all p < 0.02).
Conclusions: Women with MUI are at an increased risk of SUI failure after MUS compared with women with SUI only, but experience greater overall improvement in the impact of urinary symptoms on the quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest: JLG – none; AMP – none; VJ – none; AB – none; VS – None; HER – XYZ
Similar articles
-
Change in urinary storage symptoms following treatment for female stress urinary incontinence.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Aug;27(8):1169-74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2951-6. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26797098
-
The effect of age on stress and urgency urinary incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary midurethral sling.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun;26(6):831-5. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2594-4. Epub 2014 Dec 16. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 25510465 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life after treatment with midurethral sling and concomitant prolapse repair in patients with mixed versus stress urinary incontinence.Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Nov;30(8):1507-11. doi: 10.1002/nau.21082. Epub 2011 May 25. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011. PMID: 21618273
-
Incontinence-specific quality of life measures used in trials of sling procedures for female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis.Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Aug;47(8):1277-95. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1020-2. Epub 2015 Jun 21. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 26093584 Review.
-
Midurethral sling in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence: A literature review of functional outcomes and associated factors.Fr J Urol. 2024 Nov;34(14):102804. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102804. Epub 2024 Nov 12. Fr J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39536948 Review.
Cited by
-
Change in urinary storage symptoms following treatment for female stress urinary incontinence.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Aug;27(8):1169-74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2951-6. Epub 2016 Jan 21. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26797098
-
De novo or resolved urgency and urgency urinary incontinence after midurethral sling operations: How can we properly counsel our patients?Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Sep;60(5):373-379. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.5.373. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Investig Clin Urol. 2019. PMID: 31501800 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of hysterectomy on re-operation for stress urinary incontinence: 10 year follow-up.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;306(6):2069-2075. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06737-4. Epub 2022 Aug 31. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 36044047 Free PMC article.
-
Previous obstetrical history does not impact short-term mid-urethral sling outcomes.Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1733-1743. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04836-5. Epub 2021 May 14. Int Urogynecol J. 2021. PMID: 33988787 Free PMC article.
-
Uterine Prolapse Across the Female Lifespan: Clinical Insights and Practical Considerations from Greece.Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):212. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060212. Nurs Rep. 2025. PMID: 40559503 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, et al. Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:537–542. - PubMed
-
- Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20. - PubMed
-
- Jain P, Jirschele K, Botros SM, et al. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in mixed urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:923–932. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical