Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 May;26(5):715-20.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2580-x. Epub 2015 Jan 10.

Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence

Jonathan L Gleason et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The objective was to compare midurethral sling (MUS) urinary outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) only versus mixed UI (MUI).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent primary MUS surgery for SUI. MUI was defined as at least "moderately" bothersome urgency and stress incontinence on the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20). The primary outcome was SUI cure defined by a response of "no," "not at all," or "somewhat" bothersome SUI on both of the two UDI-6 stress subscale items. Symptom impact was assessed using the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7). Multivariable models assessed the effect of MUI on SUI outcomes.

Results: One thousand one hundred and ninety-one primary MUS procedures were reviewed. Seven hundred and fifteen out of 1,191 (60%) questionnaires were returned and 534 out of 715 (75%) had completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Mean (± SD) follow-up time was 35 ± 15 months. Women with MUI had a higher (worse) baseline total score on the UDI-6 (p ≤ 0.001). A lower proportion of women with MUI had SUI success compared with the SUI only group (64 vs 84.5%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, women in the MUI group were at an increased risk of SUI failure (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6, 4.0), but greater improvements in UDI-6 (-31.6 ± 30.6 vs -15.5 ± 25.1), and UIQ-7 scores (-21.7 ± 35.3 vs -15.1 ± 28.2) compared with women with SUI only (all p < 0.02).

Conclusions: Women with MUI are at an increased risk of SUI failure after MUS compared with women with SUI only, but experience greater overall improvement in the impact of urinary symptoms on the quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest: JLG – none; AMP – none; VJ – none; AB – none; VS – None; HER – XYZ

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, et al. Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:537–542. - PubMed
    1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20. - PubMed
    1. Brubaker L, Moalli P, Richter HE, et al. Challenges in designing a pragmatic clinical trial: the mixed incontinence – medical or surgical approach (MIMOSA) trial experience. Clin Trials. 2009;6:355–364. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brubaker L, Lukacz ES, Burgio K, et al. Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in non-surgical patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:47–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain P, Jirschele K, Botros SM, et al. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in mixed urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:923–932. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources