Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;25(9):1241-50.
doi: 10.1177/1049732314566329. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

Exploring the Legacies of Filmed Patient Narratives: The Interpretation and Appropriation of Patient Films by Health Care Staff

Affiliations

Exploring the Legacies of Filmed Patient Narratives: The Interpretation and Appropriation of Patient Films by Health Care Staff

Mary Adams et al. Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

We trace the legacies of filmed patient narratives that were edited and screened to encourage engagement with a participatory quality improvement project in an acute hospital setting in England. Using Gabriel's theory of "narrative contract," we examine the initial success of the films in establishing common grounds for participatory project and later, and more varied, interpretations of the films. Over time, the films were interpreted by staff as either useful sources of learning by critical reflection, dubious (invalid or unreliable) representations of patient experience, or as "closed" items available as auditable evidence of completed quality improvement work. We find these interpretations of the films to be shaped by the effect of social distance, the differential outcomes of project work, and changing organizational agendas. We consider the wider conditions of patient narrative as a form of quality improvement knowledge with immediate potency and fragile or fluid legitimacy over time.

Keywords: health care, users’ experiences; health care, work environment; knowledge construction; participatory action research (PAR); quality improvement; research; stories / storytelling; visual methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Abel E., Browner C. (1998). Selective compliance with biomedical authority: The uses of experiential knowledge. In Lock M., Kaufert P. (Eds.), Pragmatic women and body politics (pp. 310–326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Ainsworth S., Hardy C. (2012). Subjects of inquiry: Statistics, stories and the production of knowledge. Organization Studies, 33(12), 1693–1714.
    1. Atkinson P., Delamont S. (2006). Rescuing narrative from qualitative research. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 164–172.
    1. Bate P., Robert G. (2007). Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: Concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford, UK: Radcliffe.
    1. Benjamin W. (1968). The task of the translator. Illuminations, 69.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources