The 2014 United States National Residency Match Program data for primary care programs: a review
- PMID: 25579787
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.12.012
The 2014 United States National Residency Match Program data for primary care programs: a review
Abstract
The paper focuses on the past five years of National Residency Match Program (NRMP) information in the Unites States with a comparison point of twenty years ago utilized because of a referenced article. It is well known to our students going through the match that it is more competitive than in prior years. To rank enough programs for your field, take Step 2 early to maximize your score, to get quality letters and to practice mock interviews. The 99% match rate has remained steady over the past five years despite an increase in all primary care disciplines particularly Internal Medicine. Family Medicine and Internal Medicine work with, on average, about half U.S. seniors and half from other groups including Osteopathic and IMG (U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen). This can create a holistic experience for residents with a sharing of ideas from students from varied backgrounds. While the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program appear as an initial success, the student's goal should be to avoid such a step altogether. The key twenty years ago and today is the existence of appropriate numbers of resident and faculty role models. This is a stressful goal considering the demands on faculty for billing and patient care due to the shiftwork nature of the new work hours.
Keywords: Medical students; NRMP; Primary care programs.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Results of the 2009 National Resident Matching Program: family medicine.Fam Med. 2009 Sep;41(8):567-77. Fam Med. 2009. PMID: 19724942
-
Results of the 2013 National Resident Matching Program: family medicine.Fam Med. 2013 Oct;45(9):647-51. Fam Med. 2013. PMID: 24136696
-
Results of the 2015 National Resident Matching Program:® Family Medicine-A Comparison With 1997 and 2009.Fam Med. 2015 Oct;47(9):717-21. Fam Med. 2015. PMID: 26473565
-
An 8-Year Review of Match Outcomes From a Primary Care Pipeline Program.Fam Med. 2023 Nov;55(10):646-652. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.297644. Epub 2023 Jul 24. Fam Med. 2023. PMID: 37540531 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Addressing the Primary Care Shortage on a Shoestring: A Successful Track in an Internal Medicine Residency.Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):224-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000916. Acad Med. 2016. PMID: 26397700 Review.
Cited by
-
Initial Match Rates of an Innovative International Partnership: The Ochsner Clinical School Experience.Ochsner J. 2016 Spring;16(1):27-31. Ochsner J. 2016. PMID: 27046400 Free PMC article.
-
Time and Financial Costs for Students Participating in the National Residency Matching Program (the Match©): 2015 to 2020.Kans J Med. 2021 Mar 19;14(1):53-63. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1414568. eCollection 2021. Kans J Med. 2021. PMID: 33763180 Free PMC article.
-
Choosing emergency medicine: Influences on medical students' choice of emergency medicine.PLoS One. 2018 May 9;13(5):e0196639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196639. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29742116 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous