Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;19(1):5-25.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12337. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

A review of current practices to increase Chlamydia screening in the community--a consumer-centred social marketing perspective

Lyn Phillipson  1 , Ross Gordon  2 , Joanne Telenta  1 , Chris Magee  1 , Marty Janssen  3
Affiliations

A review of current practices to increase Chlamydia screening in the community--a consumer-centred social marketing perspective

Lyn Phillipson et al. Health Expect. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the most frequently reported sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Australia, the UK and Europe. Yet, rates of screening for STIs remain low, especially in younger adults.

Objective: To assess effectiveness of Chlamydia screening interventions targeting young adults in community-based settings, describe strategies utilized and assess them according to social marketing benchmark criteria.

Search strategy: A systematic review of relevant literature between 2002 and 2012 in Medline, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Scopus and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health was undertaken.

Results: Of 18 interventions identified, quality of evidence was low. Proportional screening rates varied, ranging from: 30.9 to 62.5% in educational settings (n = 4), 4.8 to 63% in media settings (n = 6) and from 5.7 to 44.5% in other settings (n = 7). Assessment against benchmark criteria found that interventions incorporating social marketing principles were more likely to achieve positive results, yet few did this comprehensively. Most demonstrated customer orientation and addressed barriers to presenting to a clinic for screening. Only one addressed barriers to presenting for treatment after a positive result. Promotional messages typically focused on providing facts and accessing a testing kit. Risk assessment tools appeared to promote screening among higher risk groups. Few evaluated treatment rates following positive results; therefore, impact of screening on treatment rates remains unknown.

Discussion: Future interventions should consider utilizing a comprehensive social marketing approach, using formative research to increase insight and segmentation and tailoring of screening interventions. Easy community access to both screening and treatment should be prioritized.

Keywords: Chlamydia; consumer orientation; screening; sexual health; social marketing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) . Australia's Health 2012. Australia's health series no.13. Cat. no. AUS 156. Canberra, ACT: AIHW, 2012.
    1. Eurosurveillance . Genital chlamydia now the most commonly diagnosed sexually transmitted infection in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Euro Surveillance 2002;6:pii=1863.
    1. Low N; SCREen project team . Publication of report on chlamydia control activities in Europe. Euro Surveillance, 2008; 13: 18924. - PubMed
    1. Peipert JF. Genital chlamydial infections. New England Journal of Medicine, 2003; 349: 2424–2430. - PubMed
    1. Australian Government Department of Health . Second National Sexually Transmissible Infection Strategy: 2010‐2013. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2010.

Publication types