Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Nov;46(5):520-5.
doi: 10.1002/uog.14785. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial

T Popowski et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery.

Methods: This was a pragmatic open-label randomized controlled trial that included women with a singleton pregnancy in the vertex presentation at ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, cervical dilation ≥ 8 cm and who received epidural anesthesia. Women were assigned randomly to undergo either digital vaginal examination (VE group) or both digital vaginal and ultrasound examinations (VE+US group) to determine fetal head position. When the ultrasound and digital vaginal findings were inconsistent in the VE+US group, the ultrasound result was used for clinical management. The primary outcome assessed was operative delivery (Cesarean or instrumental vaginal delivery), and maternal and fetal morbidity were also assessed.

Results: The VE and VE+US groups included 959 and 944 women, respectively. The overall rate of operative delivery was significantly higher in the VE+US group than in the VE group: 33.7% vs 27.1%, respectively (relative risk (RR), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.08-1.43)), as was the rate of Cesarean delivery: 7.8% vs 4.9%, respectively (RR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.12-2.28)). The rate of instrumental vaginal delivery was also higher, albeit not significantly: 25.8% in the VE+US group vs 22.2% in the VE group (RR, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.99-1.37)). Neonatal outcomes did not differ between the two groups. When analysis was restricted to instrumental vaginal deliveries only, maternal and neonatal morbidity outcomes were similar in both groups.

Conclusion: Correction of fetal occiput position, determined initially by digital vaginal examination, using systematic ultrasound examination did not improve management of labor and increased the rate of operative delivery without decreasing maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Keywords: Cesarean delivery; digital vaginal examination; fetal occiput position; obstetric care; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Knowledge, understanding and fetal occiput position.
    Youssef A, Pilu G. Youssef A, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):523-4. doi: 10.1002/uog.15874. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27062977 No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Rozenberg P. Rozenberg P. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):524-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.15875. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27062978 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types