Towards the implementation of 'no evidence of disease activity' in multiple sclerosis treatment: the multiple sclerosis decision model
- PMID: 25584069
- PMCID: PMC4286940
- DOI: 10.1177/1756285614560733
Towards the implementation of 'no evidence of disease activity' in multiple sclerosis treatment: the multiple sclerosis decision model
Abstract
Objective: The introduction of new and potent therapies for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) has increased the desire for therapeutic success. There is growing doubt that the mere reduction of relapse rate, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers are exclusive and appropriate factors to monitor the new aim of 'no evidence of disease activity' (NEDA). However, there is no generally accepted definition so far.
Methods: To achieve the therapeutic aim of NEDA, a panel of MS experts searched the available literature on clinical and paraclinical outcomes to propose a test battery that is sensitive to detect disease activity in an everyday clinical setting.
Results: The panel proposed to include, besides relapse rate, disability progression and MRI, neuropsychological outcome measures such as cognitive status, fatigue, depression and quality of life. To standardize the examinations in an economic and schematic way, a multifactorial model [multiple sclerosis decision model (MSDM)] that includes the domains 'relapse', 'disability progression', 'MRI', and 'neuropsychology' is proposed. The scheme reflects the complexity of the disease even in the early stages when scales such as the EDSS are not able to distinguish low levels of progression.
Conclusion: The MSDM aims to support early treatment decisions and uncover timely treatment failure. Prospective investigations are required to prove that such a disease-monitoring concept leads to an early and effective silencing of disease activity.
Keywords: disease activity; disease monitoring; magnetic resonance imaging; multiple sclerosis; neuropsychology.
Conflict of interest statement
CL: Biogen Idec GmbH, Bayer Vital GmbH, Genzyme, Merck-Serono GmbH, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Sanofi Aventis Deutschland GmbH und Teva GmbH. BCK: Bayer Health Care, Biogen Idec, Genzyme/Sanofi Aventis, Grifols, Merck-Serono, Mitsubishi Europe, Novartis, Roche, Talecris and Teva.
References
-
- Albrecht K., Kruger K., Wollenhaupt J., Alten R., Backhaus M., Baerwald C., et al. (2014) German guidelines for the sequential medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Rheumatol Int 34: 1–9. - PubMed
-
- Balcer L., Frohman E. (2010) Evaluating loss of visual function in multiple sclerosis as measured by low-contrast letter acuity. Neurology 74(Suppl. 3): S16–S23. - PubMed
-
- Barkhof F., Scheltens P., Frequin S., Nauta J., Tas M., Valk J., et al. (1992) Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: sequential enhanced MR imaging vs clinical findings in determining disease activity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159: 1041–1047. - PubMed
-
- Bevan C., Cree B. (2014) Disease activity free status: a new end point for a new era in multiple sclerosis clinical research? JAMA Neurol 71: 269–270. - PubMed
-
- Brex P., Ciccarelli O., O’Riordan J., Sailer M., Thompson A., Miller D. (2002) A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 346: 158–164. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
