Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec;4(4):407-23.
doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0262-3.

Control condition design and implementation features in controlled trials: a meta-analysis of trials evaluating psychotherapy for depression

David C Mohr  1 , Joyce Ho  1 , Tae L Hart  2 , Kelly G Baron  1 , Mark Berendsen  1 , Victoria Beckner  3 , Xuan Cai  1 , Pim Cuijpers  4 , Bonnie Spring  1 , Sarah W Kinsinger  1 , Kerstin E Schroder  5 , Jenna Duffecy  1
Affiliations
Review

Control condition design and implementation features in controlled trials: a meta-analysis of trials evaluating psychotherapy for depression

David C Mohr et al. Transl Behav Med. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Control conditions are the primary methodology used to reduce threats to internal validity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This meta-analysis examined the effects of control arm design and implementation on outcomes in RCTs examining psychological treatments for depression. A search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE identified all RCTs evaluating psychological treatments for depression published through June 2009. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects models. One hundred twenty-five trials were identified yielding 188 comparisons. Outcomes varied significantly depending control condition design (p < 0.0001). Significantly smaller effect sizes were seen when control arms used manualization (p = 0.006), therapist training (p = 0.002), therapist supervision (p = 0.009), and treatment fidelity monitoring (p = 0.003). There were no significant effects for differences in therapist experience, level of expertise in the treatment delivered, or nesting vs. crossing therapists in treatment arms. These findings demonstrate the substantial effect that decisions regarding control arm definition and implementation can have on RCT outcomes.

Keywords: Control conditions; Depression; Meta-analysis; Methodology; Randomized controlled trial design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of information
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Appleby L, Warner R, Whitton A, Faragher B. A controlled study of fluoxetine and cognitive-behavioural counselling in the treatment of postnatal depression. BMJ. 1997;314(7085):932–936. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.932. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, Czajkowski S. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):443–451. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beutler LE, Malik M, Alimohamed A, Harwood TM. Therapist variables. In: Lambert MJ, editor. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. pp. 227–306.
    1. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat; 2005.
    1. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1966.