Does interprofessional simulation increase self-efficacy: a comparative study
- PMID: 25586366
- PMCID: PMC4298099
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005472
Does interprofessional simulation increase self-efficacy: a comparative study
Abstract
Objectives: In this work, we have compared uniprofessional and interprofessional versions of a simulation education intervention, in an attempt to understand more about whether it improves trainees' self-efficacy.
Background: Interprofessionalism has been climbing the healthcare agenda for over 50 years. Simulation education attempts to create an environment for healthcare professionals to learn, without potential safety risks for patients. Integrating simulation and interprofessional education can provide benefits to individual learners.
Setting: The intervention took place in a high-fidelity simulation facility located on the campus of a large urban hospital. The centre provides educational activities for an Academic Health Sciences Centre. Approximately 2500 staff are trained at the centre each year.
Participants: One hundred and fifteen nurses and midwives along with 156 doctors, all within the early years of their postgraduate experience participated. All were included on the basis of their ongoing postgraduate education.
Methods: Each course was a one-day simulation course incorporating five clinical and one communication scenarios. After each a facilitated debriefing took place. A mixed methods approach utilised precourse and postcourse questionnaires measuring self-efficacy in managing emergency situations, communication, teamwork and leadership.
Results: Thematic analysis of qualitative data showed improvements in communication/teamwork and leadership, for doctors and nurses undergoing simulation training. These findings were confirmed by statistical analysis showing that confidence ratings improved in nurses and doctors overall (p<0.001). Improved outcomes from baseline were observed for interprofessional versus uniprofessional trained nurses (n=115; p<0.001). Postcourse ratings for doctors showed that interprofessional training was significantly associated with better final outcomes for a communication/teamwork dimension (n=156; p<0.05).
Conclusions: This study provides evidence that simulation training enhances participants' self-efficacy in clinical situations. It also leads to increases in their perceived abilities relating to communication/teamwork and leadership/management of clinical scenarios. Interprofessional training showed increased positive effects on self-efficacy for nurses and doctors.
Keywords: EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
References
-
- World Health Organisation, ed. Primary health care report of the International Conference on Primary health care. International Conference on Primary health care; 6–12 September 1978; Alma Ata Geneva: World Health Organistion, 1978.
-
- World Health Organisation. Learning together to work together for health. Report of a WHO study group on multiprofessional education for health personnel: the team approach Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1988.
-
- World Health Organisation. Framework for action in interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organisation, health HpnNaMHrf, 2010.
-
- Centre for Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE), 1987. (cited 10 Apr 2012). http://www.caipe.org.uk/about-us/
-
- General Medical Council. Tomorrows doctors: outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. 2009. (cited 2012 17th April). http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/TomorrowsDoctors_2009.pdf
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources