Outcome in patients previously on antithrombotic therapy in the SAMMPRIS trial: subgroup analysis
- PMID: 25593135
- PMCID: PMC4342339
- DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007752
Outcome in patients previously on antithrombotic therapy in the SAMMPRIS trial: subgroup analysis
Abstract
Background and purpose: Stenting has been used as a rescue therapy in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis and a transient ischemic attack or stroke when on antithrombotic therapy (AT). We determined whether the stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial supported this approach by comparing the treatments within subgroups of patients whose qualifying event (QE) occurred on versus off of AT.
Methods: The primary outcome, 30-day stroke and death and later strokes in the territory of the qualifying artery, was compared between (1) percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting plus aggressive medical therapy (PTAS) versus aggressive medical management therapy alone (AMM) for patients whose QE occurred on versus off AT and between (2) patients whose QE occurred on versus off AT separately for the treatment groups.
Results: Among the 284/451 (63%) patients who had their QE on AT, the 2-year primary end point rates were 15.6% for those randomized to AMM (n=140) and 21.6% for PTAS (n=144; P=0.043, log-rank test). In the 167 patients not on AT, the 2-year primary end point rates were 11.6% for AMM (n=87) and 18.8% for PTAS (n=80; P=0.31, log-rank test). Within both treatment groups, there was no difference in the time to the primary end point between patients who were on or off AT (AMM, P=0.96; PTAS, P=0.52; log-rank test).
Conclusions: SAMMPRIS results indicate that the benefit of AMM over PTAS is similar in patients on versus off AT at the QE and that failure of AT is not a predictor of increased risk of a primary end point.
Clinical trial registration url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
Keywords: antiplatelet agents; intracranial arteriosclerosis; stroke.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis?Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17. Stroke. 2015. PMID: 26382173 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21899409 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24168957 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting vs aggressive medical management on stroke or intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2023 May 9;13(1):7567. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34663-1. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37161029 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty with Stent Placement versus Best Medical Therapy Alone in Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: A Best Evidence Review.Cureus. 2018 Jul 16;10(7):e2988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2988. Cureus. 2018. PMID: 30397562 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rescue therapy after thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion due to underlying atherosclerosis: review of literature.Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 16;14:1181295. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1181295. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37396754 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of Recurrence of Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis in Posterior Circulation Seen to Be Higher Than That in Anterior Circulation in Long-Term Follow-Up.Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 6;11:574926. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.574926. eCollection 2020. Front Neurol. 2020. PMID: 33240200 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Sep;18(9):83. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0762-5. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27443379 Review.
-
Intracranial Stenting; the Current Landscape.Neurointervention. 2021 Mar;16(1):2-5. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2021.00087. Epub 2021 Feb 24. Neurointervention. 2021. PMID: 33626271 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Early Acute Ischemic Stroke Management for Pharmacists.Hosp Pharm. 2020 Feb;55(1):12-25. doi: 10.1177/0018578718791504. Epub 2018 Aug 7. Hosp Pharm. 2020. PMID: 31983762 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS, et al. Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial Investigators. Lancet. 2014;383:333–341. - PubMed
-
- Turan TN, Lynn MJ, Nizam A, Lane B, Egan BM, Le NA, et al. Rationale, design, and implementation of aggressive risk factor management in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:e51–e60. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Waters MF, Hoh BL, Lynn MJ, Turan TN, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, et al. Risk factors associated with failure of aggressive medical therapy in the SAMMPRIS trial. Stroke. 2014;45:A78. Abstract.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical