Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb;33(2):132-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

Quantifying on- and off-target genome editing

Affiliations
Review

Quantifying on- and off-target genome editing

Ayal Hendel et al. Trends Biotechnol. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Genome editing with engineered nucleases is a rapidly growing field thanks to transformative technologies that allow researchers to precisely alter genomes for numerous applications including basic research, biotechnology, and human gene therapy. While the ability to make precise and controlled changes at specified sites throughout the genome has grown tremendously in recent years, we still lack a comprehensive and standardized battery of assays for measuring the different genome editing outcomes created at endogenous genomic loci. Here we review the existing assays for quantifying on- and off-target genome editing and describe their utility in advancing the technology. We also highlight unmet assay needs for quantifying on- and off-target genome editing outcomes and discuss their importance for the genome editing field.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; RNA-guided endonucleases; TALENs; ZFNs; gene editing; gene targeting; homologous recombination; nonhomologous end-joining.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Assays for quantifying on-target genome editing outcomes
(A) Schematic of mutation detection assay using CEL-I/T7E1 enzyme to measure NHEJ. (B) Schematic of RFLP assay to measure HR. (C) Schematic of traffic light reporter assay to measure both NHEJ and HR. (D) Schematic of SMRT sequencing to measure both NHEJ and HR at endogenous loci. For more details, refer to the main text.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Locating nuclease off-target activity
Off-target sites are predicted through either in vitro, cellular, or in silico techniques, which generate a list of potential off-target sites. Genomic DNA is harvested from cells treated with nucleases, the sites are amplified, tested and a subset validated as bona fide off-target sites.

References

    1. Baker M. Gene-editing nucleases. Nature methods. 2012;9:23–26. - PubMed
    1. Carroll D. Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. Annual review of biochemistry. 2014;83:409–439. - PubMed
    1. Jasin M, Rothstein R. Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2013;5:a012740. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bibikova M, et al. Targeted chromosomal cleavage and mutagenesis in Drosophila using zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics. 2002;161:1169–1175. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer DE, et al. An erythroid enhancer of BCL11A subject to genetic variation determines fetal hemoglobin level. Science. 2013;342:253–257. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types