Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;14(1):27-32.
doi: 10.1007/s12522-014-0192-2. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

Acceptable pregnancy rate of unstimulated intrauterine insemination: a retrospective analysis of 17,830 cycles

Affiliations

Acceptable pregnancy rate of unstimulated intrauterine insemination: a retrospective analysis of 17,830 cycles

Tetsuro Honda et al. Reprod Med Biol. 2015.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the pregnancy rate (PR) of unstimulated intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Methods: This was a retrospective study in a private fertility clinic. Between 2004 and 2013, a total of 4,045 women underwent 17,830 cycles of unstimulated IUI. The etiologies of subfertility in the couples were unexplained (51 %), male factor (36 %), coital problems (9.5 %), and cervical factor (3.5 %).

Results: The PRs/cycle, between the 1st and 9th trials, in women <35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, and >42 years of age were 8.2, 7.3, 5.5, 3.6, and 0.9 %, respectively. In 10,076 cycles in which the male partner had a total motile sperm count ≥5 million, the PRs in the respective age groups were 9.9, 8.6, 6.1, 4.8, and 1.2 %. The largest-sized reported PRs for clomiphene citrate (CC)/IUI in the respective age groups were 11.5, 9.2, 7.3 4.3, and 1.0 % (4,199 cycles in total, Dovey et al., FertilSteril, 2008;90:2281-2286). There were no significant differences in PRs between unstimulated IUI and CC/IUI.

Conclusion: PR for unstimulated IUI was similar to the reported PR for CC/IUI. Although this was a retrospective study without a control group, to reduce multiple pregnancy rate, we believe that unstimulated IUI is a reasonable treatment.

Keywords: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; Intrauterine insemination; Multiple pregnancy; Pregnancy rate; Unstimulated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors state explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pregnancy rate (PR) and live birth rate (LBR) per trial cycle in women at <35 (a), 35–37 (b), 38–40(c), 41–42 (d), and >42 years of age (e)
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relation between pregnancy rate (PR) and the number of trial cycle in women at < 35 (a), 35–37 (b), 38–40 (c), 41–42 (d), and > 42 years of age (e)
Figure 3
Figure 3
a Cumulative live birth rate (LBR) and b the number of patients in each trial by age group

References

    1. Guzick DS, Sullivan MW, Adamson GD, Cedars MI, Falk RJ, Peterson EP et al. Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril, 1998, 70, 207–213 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nulsen JC, Walsh S, Dumez S, Metzger DA. A randomized and longitudinal study of human menopausal gonadotropin with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 82, 780–786 - PubMed
    1. Cohlen BJ, teVelde ER, Kooji RJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study. Hum Reprod, 1998, 13, 1553–1558 - DOI - PubMed
    1. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group . Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update, 2009, 15, 265–277 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stewart JA. Stimulated intra‐uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility: should the guidelines be changed?. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18, 903–914 - DOI - PubMed