Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;4(4):43-57.
doi: 10.4236/ami.2014.44006.

Physical Activity, Mediterranean Diet and Biomarkers-Assessed Risk of Alzheimer's: A Multi-Modality Brain Imaging Study

Affiliations

Physical Activity, Mediterranean Diet and Biomarkers-Assessed Risk of Alzheimer's: A Multi-Modality Brain Imaging Study

Dawn C Matthews et al. Adv J Mol Imaging. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Increased physical activity and higher adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet (MeDi) have been independently associated with reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Their association has not been investigated with the use of biomarkers. This study examines whether, among cognitively normal (NL) individuals, those who are less physically active and show lower MeDi adherence have brain biomarker abnormalities consistent with AD.

Methods: Forty-five NL individuals (age 54 ± 11, 71% women) with complete leisure time physical activity (LTA), dietary information, and cross-sectional 3D T1-weigthed MRI, 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans were examined. Voxel-wise multivariate partial least square (PLS) regression was used to examine the effects of LTA, MeDi and their interaction on brain biomarkers. Age, gender, ethnicity, education, caloric intake, BMI, family history of AD, Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, presence of hypertension and insulin resistance were examined as confounds. Subjects were dichotomized into more and less physically active (LTA+ vs. LTA-; n = 21 vs. 24), and into higher vs. lower MeDi adherence groups (n = 18 vs. 27) using published scoring methods. Spatial patterns of brain biomarkers that represented the optimal association between the images and the groups were generated for all modalities using voxel-wise multivariate Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.

Results: Groups were comparable for clinical and neuropsychological measures. Independent effects of LTA and MeDi factors were observed in AD-vulnerable brain regions for all modalities (p < 0.001). Increased AD-burden (in particular higher Aβ load and lower glucose metabolism) were observed in LTA- compared to LTA+ subjects, and in MeDi- as compared to MeDi+ subjects. A gradient effect was observed for all modalities so that LTA-/MeDi- subjects had the highest and LTA+/MeDi+ subjects had the lowest AD-burden (p < 0.001), although the LTA × MeDi interaction was significant only for FDG measures (p < 0.03). Adjusting for covariates did not attenuate these relationships.

Conclusion: Lower physical activity and MeDi adherence were associated with increased brain AD-burden among NL individuals, indicating that lifestyle factors may modulate AD risk. Studies with larger samples and longitudinal evaluations are needed to determine the predictive power of the observed associations.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s Disease; Amyloid; Brain Aging; Early Detection; Glucose Metabolism; MRI; Mediterranean Diet; PET Imaging; Physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spatial patterns of brain Aβ load as a function of physical activity and diet on PiB-PET. Top row: Partial Least Square regression maps (PLS maps; spatial biomarker patterns) that represent the optimal association between PiB-PET images and (A) leisure time physical activity (LTA), (B) Mediterranean Diet (MeDi), and (C) the combination of LTA and MeDi. P values are shown on a color-coded scale to the right. Middle row: LV scores extracted from each significant pattern show increased PiB retention, reflecting higher Aβ load, in NL showing lower vs. higher engagement in leisure time physical activity (LTA− > LTA+); in NL showing lower vs. higher adherence to the MeDi (MeDi− > MeDi+) and as a function of LTA × MeDi (LTA−/MeDi− > LTA−/MeDi+ > LTA+/MeDi− > LTA+/MeDi+). R2 values are reported for each figure (all p’s < 0.001). Bottom row: LV scores are adjusted by age.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spatial patterns of CMRglc as a function of physical activity and diet on FDG-PET. Top row: Partial Least Square regression maps (PLS maps; spatial biomarker patterns) that represent the optimal association between FDG-PET images and (A) leisure time physical activity (LTA), (B) Mediterranean Diet (MeDi), and (C) the combination of LTA and MeDi. P values are shown on a color-coded scale to the right. Middle row: LV scores extracted from each significant pattern show reduced FDG uptake, reflecting reduced CMRglc, in NL showing lower vs. higher engagement in leisure time physical activity (LTA− < LTA+); in NL showing lower vs. higher adherence to the MeDi (MeDi− < MeDi+) and as a function of LTA × MeDi (LTA−/MeDi− < LTA−/MeDi+ < LTA+/MeDi− < LTA+/MeDi+). R2 values are reported for each figure (all p’s < 0.001). Bottom row: LV scores are adjusted by age.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spatial patterns of gray matter volumes as a function of physical activity and diet on MRI. Top row: Partial Least Square regression maps (PLS maps; spatial biomarker patterns) that represent the optimal association between GMV-MRI images and (A) leisure time physical activity (LTA), (B) Mediterranean Diet (MeDi), and (C) the combination of LTA and MeDi. P values are shown on a color-coded scale to the right. Middle row: LV scores extracted from each significant pattern show reduced GMV, reflecting increased atrophy, in NL showing lower vs. higher engagement in leisure time physical activity (LTA− < LTA+); in NL showing lower vs. higher adherence to the MeDi (MeDi− < MeDi+) and as a function of LTA × MeDi (LTA−/MeDi− < LTA−/MeDi+ < LTA+/MeDi− < LTA+/MeDi+). R2 values are reported for each figure (all p’s < 0.001). Bottom row: LV scores are adjusted by age.

References

    1. Barnes DE, Yaffe K. The Projected Effect of Risk Factor Reduction on Alzheimer’s Disease Prevalence. The Lancet Neurology. 2011;10:819–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70072-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sperling RA, Karlawish J, Johnson KA. Preclinical Alzheimer Disease—The Challenges Ahead. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2013;9:54–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.241. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jack CR, Jr., Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical Model of Dynamic Biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s Pathological Cascade. The Lancet Neurology. 2010;9:119–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gu Y, Scarmeas N. Dietary Patterns in Alzheimer’s Disease and Cognitive Aging. Current Alzheimer Research. 2011;8:510–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720511796391836. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scarmeas N, Stern Y, Mayeux R, Manly JJ, Schupf N, Luchsinger JA. Mediterranean Diet and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Archives of Neurology. 2009;66:216–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2008.536. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources