Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 May;44(5):1011-23.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0252-x. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Can brief alcohol interventions for youth also address concurrent illicit drug use? results from a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Can brief alcohol interventions for youth also address concurrent illicit drug use? results from a meta-analysis

Emily E Tanner-Smith et al. J Youth Adolesc. 2015 May.

Abstract

Brief interventions aimed at reducing alcohol use among youth may interrupt a possible developmental progression to more serious substance use if they can also affect the use of other illicit drugs. This meta-analysis examined the findings of recent research on the effects of brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults on both alcohol and illicit drug use. Eligible studies were those using randomized or controlled quasi-experimental designs to examine the effects of brief alcohol interventions on illicit drug use outcomes among youth. A comprehensive literature search identified 30 eligible study samples that, on average, included participants age 17, with 57 % male participants and 56 % White youth. Three-level random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate mean effect sizes and explore variability in effects. Overall, brief interventions targeting both alcohol and other drugs were effective in reducing both of these substances. However, the brief interventions that targeted only alcohol had no significant secondary effects on untargeted illicit drug use. The evidence from current research, therefore, shows modest beneficial effects on outcomes that are targeted by brief interventions for youth, but does not show that those effects generalize to untargeted illicit drug use outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KCW acknowledges that he is an author of two of the primary studies included in the meta-analysis but was not involved in extracting data from those studies; he has no other conflict of interest. ETS, KSF, EH, and MWL declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
STUDY IDENTIFICATION FLOW DIAGRAM
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scatterplot of Method-Adjusted Effect Sizes, Intervention Follow-up Timing, Intervention Duration, and Participant Age Notes The figures depict the average effect size for each unique study sample at each (a) follow-up wave (b) intervention duration and (c) average participant age. Effects are shown proportionate to each study’s average weight in the meta-analysis.

References

    1. Albert D, Chein J, Steinberg L. The teenage brain: Peer influences on adolescent decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2013;22:114–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allison PD. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
    1. Beyers JM, Toumbourou JW, Catalano RF, Arthur MW, Hawkins JD. A cross-national comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: The United States and Australia. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2004;35:3–16. - PubMed
    1. Burke BL, Dunn CW, Atkins DC, Phelps JS. The emerging evidence base for motivational interviewing: A meta-analytic and qualitative inquiry. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2004;18:309–322.
    1. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Carey MP, DeMartini KS. Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: A meta-analytic review. Addictive Behaviors. 2007;32:2469–2494. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types